Cited by 99Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyStress Responses and Cortisol

Epigenetics and depressive disorders: a review of current progress and future directions

Januar, Vania, Saffery, Richard, Ryan, Joanne·2015·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several broad lines of evidence support the involvement of epigenetic processes in neurodevelopment and psychiatric disorders. Epigenetic disruption also provides a potential mechanism to account for the numerous gene-environment interactions that have been reported in association with neuropsychiatric phenotypes. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed with keywords 'depression', 'depressive disorder' or 'antidepressants' and 'DNA methylation', or 'epigenetics' in humans. Citations were limited to those written in English and published prior to July 2014. RESULTS: We present a summary of results to date. Most studies have focused on DNA methylation in various CNS or peripheral tissue, with almost universally small sample sizes. Although seven epigenome-wide association studies have now been reported, the majority of studies have used a candidate-gene approach. Three genes (SLC6A4, BDNF, NR3C1) have been investigated in more than one study, but replication of findings is generally lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Recent evidence provides insights to epigenetic processes in psychiatric disorders; however, replication is lacking and care must be taken in the interpretation of current findings. This applies to epigenetic epidemiology generally, which is subject to various limitations that no single approach can address in isolation. Due to limited focus of most depression studies to date, placing the findings within the broader context of mood disorder pathophysiology may prove challenging. However, identifying peripheral biomarkers for depressive disorder remains a tantalising possibility, especially given the potential for carefully-designed longitudinal studies with multiple biospecimens and ongoing advances in epigenetic technologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyu273

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Januar, V., Saffery, R., & Ryan, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2015-02-24
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
1364-1387
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2109270323
Cited by
99
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
epigenetics, depression, DNA methylation, gene-environment interaction, epigenome-wide association study, serotonin transporter, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, NR3C1, antidepressants, mood disorders, peripheral biomarkers, brain development
MeSH terms
Animals, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, Biomarkers, DNA Methylation, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Epigenesis, Genetic, Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review