Cited by 149Stress Responses and CortisolEpigenetics and DNA MethylationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Chronic Stress Induces Sex-Specific Alterations in Methylation and Expression of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Gene in the Rat

Open access
Sterrenburg, Linda, Gaszner, Balázs, Boerrigter, Jeroen, Santbergen, Lennart, Bramini, Mattia, Elliott, Evan, Chen, Alon, Peeters, Bernard W. M. M. +2 more·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the higher prevalence of depression in women than in men is well known, the neuronal basis of this sex difference is largely elusive. METHODS: Male and female rats were exposed to chronic variable mild stress (CVMS) after which immediate early gene products, corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) mRNA and peptide, various epigenetic-associated enzymes and DNA methylation of the Crf gene were determined in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), oval (BSTov) and fusiform (BSTfu) parts of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and central amygdala (CeA). RESULTS: CVMS induced site-specific changes in Crf gene methylation in all brain centers studied in female rats and in the male BST and CeA, whereas the histone acetyltransferase, CREB-binding protein was increased in the female BST and the histone-deacetylase-5 decreased in the male CeA. These changes were accompanied by an increased amount of c-Fos in the PVN, BSTfu and CeA in males, and of FosB in the PVN of both sexes and in the male BSTov and BSTfu. In the PVN, CVMS increased CRF mRNA in males and CRF peptide decreased in females. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm our hypothesis that chronic stress affects gene expression and CRF transcriptional, translational and secretory activities in the PVN, BSTov, BSTfu and CeA, in a brain center-specific and sex-specific manner. Brain region-specific and sex-specific changes in epigenetic activity and neuronal activation may play, too, an important role in the sex specificity of the stress response and the susceptibility to depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0028128

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [53]Snedecor GW Cochran WG 1989 Statistical methods, 8th ed. Ames, IA Iowa State University Press 503
  2. [61]Nestler EJ Kelz MB Chen J 1999 DeltaFosB: a molecular mediator of long-term neural and behavioral plasticity. Brain Res 835 10 17 10448191

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sterrenburg, L., Gaszner, B., Boerrigter, J., Santbergen, L., Bramini, M., Elliott, E., Chen, A., Peeters, B. W. M. M., Roubos, E. W., & Kozicz, T.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University of Pecs (HU)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Corresponding author
Kozicz, Tamás
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-11-23
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
e28128
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159916106
Cited by
149
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (864.05.008)
  • Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
corticotropin-releasing factor, DNA methylation, sex differences, depression, hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, central amygdala, CREB-binding protein, HDAC5, c-fos, FosB, immediate early genes, epigenetic regulation, stress response
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Chronic Disease, Corticosterone, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Models, Biological, Paraventricular Hypothalamic Nucleus, Septal Nuclei, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Rats, Wistar, In Situ Hybridization, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review