The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database*
Abstract
WordNet is an on-line lexical reference system whose design is inspired by current psycholinguistic theories of human lexical memory. English nouns, verbs, and adjectives are organized into synonym sets, each representing one underlying lexical concept. Different relations link the synonym sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Duncker, K. (1945) · Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093599 · Cited by 2,938
The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings
Gleitman, L. (1990) · Language Acquisition · doi:10.1207/s15327817la0101_2 · Cited by 1,783
The language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field
Johnson-laird, P. N., & Oatley, K. (1989) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699938908408075 · Cited by 736
Cited by
YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger
Redmon, J., & Farhadi, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.690 · Cited by 19,892
WordNet: a lexical database for English
Miller, G. A. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219717.219748 · Cited by 14,015
Self-citationMining and summarizing customer reviews
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073 · Cited by 7,793
Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications
Calvo, R. A., & D'Mello, S. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2010.1 · Cited by 1,893
A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics
Liu, Y., Zhang, D., Lu, G., & Ma, W.-Y. (2007) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2006.04.045 · Cited by 1,696
Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns
Mitchell, T. M., Shinkareva, S. V., Carlson, A., Chang, K.-M., Malave, V. L., Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152876 · Cited by 1,180
A Survey of Automatic Query Expansion in Information Retrieval
Carpineto, C., & Romano, G. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2071389.2071390 · Cited by 1,109
BEAT: the Behavior Expression Animation Toolkit
Cassell, J., Vilhjálmsson, H. H., & Bickmore, T. (2001) · Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/383259.383315 · Cited by 739
A review of object detection based on deep learning
Xiao, Y., Tian, Z., Yu, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Du, S., & Lan, X. (2020) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-020-08976-6 · Cited by 584
Linguistic Features of Writing Quality
McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2010) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088309351547 · Cited by 570
Generating Visual Explanations
Hendricks, L. A., Akata, Z., Rohrbach, M., Donahue, J., Schiele, B., & Darrell, T. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_1 · Cited by 534
A Systematic Review of Automatic Question Generation for Educational Purposes
Kurdi, G., Leo, J., Parsia, B., Sattler, U., & Al-Emari, S. (2020) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-019-00186-y · Cited by 514
YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger
Redmon, J., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.08242 · Cited by 488
Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension
Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x · Cited by 325
Query expansion techniques for information retrieval: a survey
Azad, H. K., & Deepak, A. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.05.009 · Cited by 313
Sentiment analysis: A survey on design framework, applications and future scopes
Bordoloi, M., & Biswas, S. K. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10442-2 · Cited by 183
Automatic Multiple Choice Question Generation From Text: A Survey
CH, D. R., & Saha, S. K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2018.2889100 · Cited by 144
Measuring neural representations with fMRI: practices and pitfalls
Davis, T., & Poldrack, R. A. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12156 · Cited by 132
Hyperbolic Entailment Cones for Learning Hierarchical Embeddings
Ganea, O.-E., Bécigneul, G., & Hofmann, T. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.01882 · Cited by 115
“, 2015) and use the full transitive closure of the WordNet noun hierarchy (Miller et al., 1990).”
BackgroundMethodReddy, S., Raghu, D., Khapra, M. M., & Joshi, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-1036 · Cited by 93
Data-Driven Design-By-Analogy: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions
Jiang, S., Hu, J., Wood, K. L., & Luo, J. (2022) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4051681 · Cited by 86
A semantic graph-based approach to biomedical summarisation
Plaza, L., Díaz, A., & Gervás, P. (2011) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2011.06.005 · Cited by 83
Ontology and epistemology for agent-based wayfinding simulation
Raubal, M. (2001) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658810110061171 · Cited by 81
Checking and bootstrapping lexical norms by means of word similarity indexes
Bestgen, Y., & Vincze, N. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0195-z · Cited by 75
Singh, K. N., Devi, S. D., Devi, H. M., & Mahanta, A. K. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100061 · Cited by 75
Generating Visual Explanations
Hendricks, L. A., Akata, Z., Rohrbach, M., Donahue, J., Schiele, B., & Darrell, T. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.08507 · Cited by 64
Millar, N., Batalo, B., & Budgell, B. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28676 · Cited by 57
Measuring machine translation quality as semantic equivalence: A metric based on entailment features
Padó, S., Cer, D., Galley, M., Jurafsky, D., & Manning, C. D. (2009) · Machine Translation · doi:10.1007/s10590-009-9060-y · Cited by 47
A Framework for Deprecating Datasets: Standardizing Documentation, Identification, and Communication
Luccioni, A. S., Corry, F., Sridharan, H., Ananny, M., Schultz, J., & Crawford, K. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533086 · Cited by 22
A comprehensive review on MCQ generation from text
Madri, V. R., & Meruva, S. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-14768-5 · Cited by 15
Domain-specific sentiment analysis: An optimized deep learning approach for the financial markets
Yekrangi, M., & Nikolov, N. S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3293733 · Cited by 14
Deanthropomorphising NLP: Can a language model be conscious?
Shardlow, M., & Przybyła, P. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307521 · Cited by 16
Concreteness and disagreement: Comment on Pollock (2018)
Neath, I., & Surprenant, A. M. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00992-8 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, G. A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., & Miller, K. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Lexicography
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 235-244
- ISSN
- 0950-3846 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4577
- OpenAlex
- W2102381086
- Cited by
- 4,197
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 71.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
