Cited by 93Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesSpeech and dialogue systems

Generating Natural Language Question-Answer Pairs from a Knowledge Graph Using a RNN Based Question Generation Model

Open access
Reddy, Sathish, Raghu, Dinesh, Khapra, Mitesh M., Joshi, Sachindra·2017·Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers

Abstract

Sathish Reddy, Dinesh Raghu, Mitesh M. Khapra, Sachindra Joshi. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers. 2017.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/e17-1036

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Husam Ali, Yllias Chali, and Sadid A Hasan. 2010. Automation of question generation from sentences. In Proceedings of QG2010: The Third Workshop on Question Generation, pages 58-67.
  2. Saidalavi Kalady, Ajeesh Elikkottil, and Rajarshi Das. 2010. Natural language question generation using syntax and keywords. In Proceedings of QG2010: The Third Workshop on Question Generation, pages 1-10. questiongeneration. org.
  3. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher D. Man- ning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-of- speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In HLT-NAACL.
  4. Andrea Varga. 2010. Le an ha 2010 wlv: A ques- tion generation system for the qgstec 2010 task b. In Proceedings of QG2010: The Third Workshop on Question Generation, pages 80-83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reddy, S., Raghu, D., Khapra, M. M., & Joshi, S.
Affiliations
  • Samsung (South Korea) (KR)
  • IBM Research - India (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers
Published
2017
Pages
376-385
OpenAlex
W2741253951
Cited by
93
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.74
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
question generation, question-answer pairs, knowledge graphs, recurrent neural networks, natural language generation, question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review