Cited by 31Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Selective pharmacological augmentation of hippocampal activity produces a sustained antidepressant-like response without abuse-related or psychotomimetic effects

Open access
Carreno, Flavia R., Collins, Gregory T., Frazer, Alan, Lodge, Daniel J.·2017·International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Background: Selective augmentation of hippocampal activity in ways similar to that caused by ketamine may have therapeutic advantages over ketamine, which has psychotomimetic and reinforcing effects likely due to effects outside the hippocampus (i.e., off-target effects). Methods: Here we evaluated the antidepressant-like response to a negative allosteric modulator of α5 subunit- containing gamma aminobutyric acid subtype A receptors, L-655,708, as these receptors are expressed to a much greater extent in the hippocampus than in other brain areas. Results: Systemic administration of L-655,708 produced a sustained antidepressant-like effect in the forced swim test that was comparable with that of ketamine and was blocked by hippocampal inactivation with lidocaine. However, in contrast to ketamine, L-655,708 did not affect prepulse inhibition of startle, nor did it maintain responding in rats trained to self-administer i.v. ketamine. Conclusion: Taken together, these findings suggest that activation of the hippocampus by L-655,708 produces an antidepressant-like effect in the absence of any psychotomimetic or abuse-related effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ijnp/pyx003

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The antidepressant-like effects of the α5 negative allosteric modulator L-655,708 are blocked with an intrahippocampal infusion of lidocaine.

    “Furthermore, the antidepressant-like effects of the α5 negative allosteric modulator L-655,708 are blocked with an intrahippocampal infusion of lidocaine [140].”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [140]

  • Effects of negative allosteric modulators of α5GABAARs are observed both 1 hour and 24 hours following administration.

    “Although it is not entirely clear how positive and negative modulation of the same receptor subtype could have antidepressant-like effects, it should be noted that the effects of the negative allosteric modulators are observed both 1 hour and 24 hours following administration.”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [140]

  • Administration of partial inverse agonists at the benzodiazepine binding site of alpha5-containing GABAA receptors promotes coherent network activity via disinhibition of excitatory neurotransmission and exerts rapid antidepressant actions in several animal tests.

    “Further supporting this hypothesis, administration of partial inverse agonists at the benzodiazepine binding site of alpha5-containing GABAA receptors, which are selectively expressed in the forebrain, including prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, promote coherent network activity via disinhibition of excitatory neurotransmission 45 and exert rapid antidepressant actions in several animal tests 46–”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine action as an antidepressant (2018) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carreno, F. R., Collins, G. T., Frazer, A., & Lodge, D. J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Carreno, Flavia R.
Venue
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2017-01-25
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
504-509
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2601083671
Cited by
31
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX000559)
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh090067-10)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01: MH090067, R01MH082933)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
alpha5 GABA-A receptor, hippocampal activation, antidepressant-like effects, ketamine, negative allosteric modulators, prepulse inhibition, psychotomimetic effects, forced swim test, off-target effects
MeSH terms
Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Hippocampus, Imidazoles, Ketamine, Lidocaine, Receptors, GABA-A, Self Administration, Reflex, Startle, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Substance-Related Disorders, Prepulse Inhibition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review