Cited by 250Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Contribution of Hippocampal and Extra-Hippocampal NR2B-Containing NMDA Receptors to Performance on Spatial Learning Tasks

Open access
von Engelhardt, Jakob, Doganci, Beril, Jensen, Vidar, Hvalby, Øivind, Göngrich, Christina, Taylor, Amy, Barkus, Chris, Sanderson, David J. +4 more·2008·Neuron

Abstract

Controversy revolves around the differential contribution of NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors, which coexist in principal forebrain neurons, to synaptic plasticity and learning in the adult brain. Here, we report genetically modified mice in which the NR2B subunit is selectively ablated in principal neurons of the entire postnatal forebrain or only the hippocampus. NR2B ablation resulted in smaller NMDA receptor-mediated EPSCs with accelerated decay kinetics, as recorded in CA1 pyramidal cells. CA3-to-CA1 field LTP remained largely unaltered, although a pairing protocol revealed decreased NMDA receptor-mediated charge transfer and reduced cellular LTP. Mice lacking NR2B in the forebrain were impaired on a range of memory tasks, presenting both spatial and nonspatial phenotypes. In contrast, hippocampus-specific NR2B ablation spared hippocampus-dependent, hidden-platform water maze performance but induced a selective, short-term, spatial working memory deficit for recently visited places. Thus, both hippocampal and extra-hippocampal NR2B containing NMDA receptors critically contribute to spatial performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.039

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Removal of the GluN2B subunit by knockout or knockdown produces variable effects on LTP, ranging from complete block to partial impairment.

    “The first approach removed the GluN2B subunit, either by knockout or knockdown. The results vary from a complete block of LTP (226, 227) to a partial impairment (228, 229).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [228]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Engelhardt, J., Doganci, B., Jensen, V., Hvalby, Ø., Göngrich, C., Taylor, A., Barkus, C., Sanderson, D. J., Rawlins, J. N. P., Seeburg, P. H., Bannerman, D. M., & Monyer, H.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Max Planck Institute for Medical Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Monyer, Hannah
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
846-860
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018213389
Cited by
250
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 30
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (SRF 074385/Z/04/Z, 087736)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
NR2A subunit, hippocampus, spatial learning, spatial working memory, long-term potentiation, CA1 pyramidal neurons, excitatory postsynaptic potentials, synaptic plasticity, memory impairment, genetically modified mice
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Electron Transport Complex IV, Discrimination, Psychological, Electric Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Membrane Potentials, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Space Perception, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Amino Acid Agents, Maze Learning, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Recognition, Psychology, Mice, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review