Cited by 29Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Negative Allosteric Modulation of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid A Receptors at α5 Subunit–Containing Benzodiazepine Sites Reverses Stress-Induced Anhedonia and Weakened Synaptic Function in Mice

Open access
Troppoli, Timothy A., Zanos, Panos, Georgiou, Polymnia, Gould, Todd D., Rudolph, Uwe, Thompson, Scott M.·2022·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Abnormal reward processing, typically anhedonia, is a hallmark of human depression and is accompanied by altered functional connectivity in reward circuits. Negative allosteric modulators of GABA A (gamma-aminobutyric acid A) receptors (GABA-NAMs) have rapid antidepressant-like properties in rodents and exert few adverse effects, but molecular targets underlying their behavioral and synaptic effects remain undetermined. We hypothesized that GABA-NAMs act at the benzodiazepine site of GABA A receptors containing α5 subunits to increase gamma oscillatory activity, strengthen synapses in reward circuits, and reverse anhedonia.Methods Anhedonia was induced by chronic stress in male mice and assayed by preferences for sucrose and female urine (n = 5-7 mice/group). Hippocampal slices were then prepared for electrophysiological recording (n = 1-6 slices/mouse, 4-6 mice/group). Electroencephalography power was quantified in response to GABA-NAM and ketamine administration (n = 7-9 mice/group).Results Chronic stress reduced sucrose and female urine preferences and hippocampal temporoammonic-CA1 synaptic strength. A peripheral injection of the GABA-NAM MRK-016 restored hedonic behavior and AMPA-to-NMDA ratios in wild-type mice. These actions were prevented by pretreatment with the benzodiazepine site antagonist flumazenil. MRK-016 administration increased gamma power over the prefrontal cortex in wild-type mice but not α5 knockout mice, whereas ketamine promoted gamma power in both genotypes. Hedonic behavior and AMPA-to-NMDA ratios were only restored by MRK-016 in stressed wild-type mice but not α5 knockout mice.Conclusions α5-Selective GABA-NAMs exert rapid anti-anhedonic actions and restore the strength of synapses in reward regions by acting at the benzodiazepine site of α5-containing GABA A receptors. These results encourage human studies using GABA-NAMs to treat depression by providing readily translatable measures of target engagement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.11.024

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ketamine and GABA A receptor negative allosteric modulators promote gamma oscillations in the prefrontal cortex at doses that reverse chronic stress behavioral consequences.

    “Indeed, ketamine and GABA A receptor negative allosteric modulators share an ability to promote gamma oscillations in the PFC at doses that reverse the behavioral consequences of chronic stress [152,153].”
  • Subsequent preclinical experiments supported the hypothesis that negative allosteric modulators of GABA A receptors containing alpha5 subunits would produce a ketamine-like rapid antidepressant response.

    “Subsequent preclinical experiments supported this hypothesis [152,273].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Troppoli, T. A., Zanos, P., Georgiou, P., Gould, T. D., Rudolph, U., & Thompson, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Scott M.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
216-226
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200080266
Cited by
29
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Allergan
  • National Institutes of Health (R01GM128183-01A1, R01 MH086828, R01MH095905-01A1, R01-MH107615)
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (25623)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (101BX003631, 101BX004062)
  • NARSAD
  • Roche
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (15/300,984)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
negative allosteric modulators, GABAA receptor, alpha5 subunit, benzodiazepine binding site, anhedonia, chronic stress, depression, reward systems, gamma oscillations, flumazenil, ketamine, target engagement
MeSH terms
Animals, Benzodiazepines, Female, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Ketamine, Male, Receptors, GABA-A, Sucrose, N-Methylaspartate, Receptors, GABA, alpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acid, Mice, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review