Cited by 40Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Comparison of the Efficacy of Polyenes and Triazoles against Hematogenous Candida krusei Infection in Neutropenic Mice

Karyotakis, N. C., Anaissie, E. J., Hachem, R., Dignani, M. C., Samonis, G.·1993·Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Candida krusei is reported to cause serious infections in immunocompromised patients, particularly those receiving prophylaxis with antifungal azoles. Treatment of this infection can be very challenging. The efficacy of amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B (three dosages), fluconazole, and D0870 (a new experimental oral bis-triazole) was assessed in a CF1 mouse model of hematogenous C. krusei infection. Increased survival time and reduced kidney fungal burden were achieved with treatment with amphotericin B at 2 mg/kg/day and liposomal amphotericin B at 8 and 15 mg/kg/day. D0870 at 25 mg/kg/day increased survival time but had no effect on clearance from organs, while the survival and clearance from organs of mice treated with fluconazole at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day did not differ from those of untreated animals. These findings suggest that deoxycholate and liposome-encapsulated amphotericin B are active against disseminated C. krusei infection in neutropenic mice and confirm the in vitro and in vivo resistance of this species to fluconazole.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/168.5.1311

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delivery of additional amphotericin B by use of a lipid-based preparation may be inadequate to overcome resistance in C. glabrata and C. krusei.

    “Of importance, delivery of additional amphotericin B by use of a lipid-based preparation of amphotericin B may be inadequate to overcome this resistance [22].”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karyotakis, N. C., Anaissie, E. J., Hachem, R., Dignani, M. C., & Samonis, G.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Anaissie, E. J.
Venue
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
1993-11-01
Volume
168
Issue
5
Pages
1311-1313
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2140058311
Cited by
40
References
13
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA-16672, P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Candida krusei, neutropenic mice, amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, fluconazole, antifungal efficacy, fluconazole resistance, kidney fungal burden, disseminated fungal infection
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Animals, Candidiasis, Hematopoiesis, Immunosuppression Therapy, Liposomes, Male, Neutropenia, Fluconazole, Survival Analysis, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review