Cited by 420Healthcare Quality and ManagementQuality and Supply ManagementHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

Application of Lean thinking to health care: issues and observations

Open access
Joosten, T., Bongers, I., Janssen, R.·2009·International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incidents and quality problems are a prime cause why health care leaders are calling to redesign health care delivery. One of the concepts used is lean thinking. Yet, lean often leads to resistance. Also, there is a lack of high quality evidence supporting lean premises. In this paper, we present an overview of lean thinking and its application to health care. DEVELOPMENT, THEORY AND APPLICATION OF LEAN THINKING TO HEALTH CARE: Lean thinking evolved from a tool designed to improve operational shop-floor performance at an automotive manufacturer to a management approach with both operational and sociotechnical aspects. Sociotechnical dynamics have until recently not received much attention. At the same time a balanced approach might lead to a situation where operational and sociotechnical improvements are mutually reinforcing. Application to health care has been limited and focussed mainly on operational aspects using original lean tools. A more integrative approach would be to pay more attention to sociotechnical dynamics of lean implementation efforts. Also, the need to use the original lean tools may be limited, because health care may have different instruments and tools already in use that are in line with lean thinking principles. DISCUSSION: We believe lean thinking has the potential to improve health care delivery. At the same time, there are methodological and practical considerations that need to be taken into account. Otherwise, lean implementation will be superficial and fail, adding to existing resistance and making it more difficult to improve health care in the long term.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/intqhc/mzp036

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Desirable patient care effects of Lean dominate both in the presently reviewed ED literature and in health care more generally.

    “Desirable patient care effects of Lean dominate both in the presently reviewed ED literature and in health care more generally [93].”

    From Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review (2011) · cites this paper as [93]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Miller D Going Lean in Health Care 2005 Cambridge, MA Institute for Health Care Improvement
  2. Rother M Shook J Learning to see - Value Stream Mapping to Create Value and Eliminate Muda 2003 Cambridge, MA Lean Enterprise Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joosten, T., Bongers, I., & Janssen, R.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Joosten, T.
Venue
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Published
2009-08-19
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
341-347
ISSN
  • 1353-4505 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3677
OpenAlex
W2152515782
Cited by
420
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 19
FWCI
25.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • International Journal for Quality in Health Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Universiteit van Tilburg
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Keywords
lean thinking, socio-technical dynamics, operational improvement, implementation resistance, lean tools, quality improvement
MeSH terms
Hospital Administration, Humans, Organizational Culture, Efficiency, Organizational, Total Quality Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review