Cited by 58Quality and Supply ManagementSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementManagement and Optimization Techniques

A case study of kanban implementation within the pharmaceutical supply chain

Open access
Papalexi, Marina, Bamford, David, Dehe, Benjamin·2016·International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications

Abstract

This study explores the implementation of the kanban system, which is a Lean technique, within the pharmaceutical supply chain (PSC). The case study provides insights on the benefits and challenges arising from the application of this technique, within a group of cooperative pharmacists, in Greece. The research questions developed from the review of the literature were tested using evidence from field-based, action research within a pharmaceutical organisation. The reported case study contributes to the longer term debate on assessing the Lean maturity level within the health-care sector. There are two primary findings: (i) that the adoption of kanban system provides a strategic benefit and improves the quality of services. (ii) It also provides a basis for a strategy of operational change; it gives the opportunity to the organisation to move away from the current push delivery and logistics systems towards improved logistics strategy models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13675567.2015.1075478

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papalexi, M., Bamford, D., & Dehe, B.
Affiliations
University of Huddersfield (GB)
Corresponding author
Papalexi, Marina
Venue
International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications
Published
2015-09-18
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
239-255
ISSN
  • 1367-5567 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-848X
OpenAlex
W1001023101
Cited by
58
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
Kanban, pharmaceutical supply chain, lean manufacturing, lean maturity, cooperative pharmacy, logistics strategy, service quality, operational changes, Greece

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review