The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial efflux pump inhibitors from natural sources
Abstract
The rapid spread of bacteria expressing multidrug resistance (MDR) has necessitated the discovery of new antibacterials and resistance-modifying agents. Since the initial discovery of bacterial efflux pumps in the 1980s, many have been characterized in community- and hospital-acquired Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and, more recently, in mycobacteria. Efflux pumps are able to extrude structurally diverse compounds, including antibiotics used in a clinical setting; the latter are rendered therapeutically ineffective. Antibiotic resistance can develop rapidly through changes in the expression of efflux pumps, including changes to some antibiotics considered to be drugs of last resort. It is therefore imperative that new antibiotics, resistance-modifying agents and, more specifically, efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs) are characterized. The use of bacterial resistance modifiers such as EPIs could facilitate the re-introduction of therapeutically ineffective antibiotics back into clinical use such as ciprofloxacin and might even suppress the emergence of MDR strains. Here we review the literature on bacterial EPIs derived from natural sources, primarily those from plants. The resistance-modifying activities of many new chemical classes of EPIs warrant further studies to assess their potential as leads for clinical development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinically Relevant Chromosomally Encoded Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps in Bacteria
Piddock, L. J. V. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.19.2.382-402.2006 · Cited by 1,231
Self-citationEfflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance
Poole, K. (2005) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dki171 · Cited by 1,082
Stermitz, F. R., Scriven, L. N., Tegos, G., & Lewis, K. (2002) · Planta Medica · doi:10.1055/s-2002-36347 · Cited by 114
Cited by
Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance
Poole, K. (2005) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dki171 · Cited by 1,082
Drug combinations: a strategy to extend the life of antibiotics in the 21st century
Tyers, M., & Wright, G. D. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-018-0141-x · Cited by 820
Bacterial multidrug efflux pumps: Mechanisms, physiology and pharmacological exploitations
Sun, J., Deng, Z., & Yan, A. (2014) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.05.090 · Cited by 746
Antibacterial Cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa: A Structure−Activity Study
Appendino, G., Gibbons, S., Giana, A., Pagani, A., Grassi, G., Stavri, M., Smith, E., & Rahman, M. M. (2008) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np8002673 · Cited by 661
Self-citationPlant-Derived Antimicrobial Compounds: Alternatives to Antibiotics
Savoia, D. (2012) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.12.68 · Cited by 601
Metadata
- Authors
- Stavri, M., Piddock, L. J. V., & Gibbons, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-12-04
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1247-1260
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2159355055
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial efflux pump inhibitors from natural sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkl460
- The paper
- Stavri, M., Piddock, L. J. V., & Gibbons, S. (2007). Bacterial efflux pump inhibitors from natural sources. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl460
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.