Cited by 88Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

MSG-10: a Phase 2 study of oral ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) following initial echinocandin therapy in non-neutropenic patients with invasive candidiasis

Spec, Andrej, Pullman, John, Thompson, George R, Powderly, William G, Tobin, Ellis H, Vazquez, Jose, Wring, Stephen A, Angulo, David +28 more·2019·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of oral ibrexafungerp (formerly SCY-078), a novel orally bioavailable β-glucan synthase inhibitor, in subjects with invasive candidiasis versus the standard of care (SOC) and to identify the dose to achieve target exposure (15.4 μM·h) in >80% of the intended population. Methods: In a multinational, open-label study, patients with documented invasive candidiasis were randomized to receive step-down therapy to one of three treatment arms: two dosing regimens of novel oral ibrexafungerp or the SOC treatment following initial echinocandin therapy. Plasma samples were collected to evaluate exposure by population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling. Safety was assessed throughout the study and global response at the end of treatment. Results: Out of 27 subjects enrolled, 7 received ibrexafungerp 500 mg, 7 received ibrexafungerp 750 mg and 8 received the SOC. Five did not meet criteria for randomization. Population PK analysis indicated that an ibrexafungerp 750 mg regimen is predicted to achieve the target exposure in ∼85% of the population. The rate of adverse events was similar among patients receiving ibrexafungerp or fluconazole. Similar favourable response rates were reported among all groups: 86% (n = 6) in the ibrexafungerp 750 mg versus 71% (n = 5) in both the fluconazole and ibrexafungerp 500 mg treatment arms. The one subject treated with continued micafungin had a favourable global response. Conclusions: The oral ibrexafungerp dose estimated to achieve the target exposure in subjects with invasive candidiasis is 750 mg daily. This dose was well tolerated and achieved a favourable global response rate, similar to the SOC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkz277

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ibrexafungerp is currently only FDA approved as oral therapy for vulvovaginal candidiasis.

    “Ibrexafungerp is currently only FDA approved as oral therapy for vulvovaginal candidiasis, although clinical trials for invasive candidiasis step-down therapy, refractory candidiasis, and C. auris are ongoing.149,156–159”

    From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis (2024) · cites this paper as [158]

  • Ibrexafungerp has oral bioavailability of 35-50% and good systemic distribution except for the CNS.

    “It has oral bioavailability of 35–50% and good systemic distribution except for the CNS.”

    From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis (2024) · cites this paper as [158]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spec, A., Pullman, J., Thompson, G. R., Powderly, W. G., Tobin, E. H., Vazquez, J., Wring, S. A., Angulo, D., Helou, S., Pappas, P. G., Mycoses Study Group, Vasquez, J., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Patterson, T., Alexander, B., Boucher, H., Pappas, P., Betts, R., Schuster, M., Shoham, S., Revankar, S., Mushatt, D., Bedimo, R., Freifeld, A., Nguyen, M. H., Mylonakis, E., Kett, D., Reboli, A., Walsh, T., Pouch, S., Almyroudis, N., Andes, D., Hadley, S., Barron, M., Mullane, K., & Miller, L.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Mercury Street Medical, Butte, MT, USA
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Albany Medical Center Hospital (US)
  • Medical College of Georgia/Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
  • Scynexis (United States) (US)
  • University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
  • Augusta University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Spec, Andrej
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2019-07-15
Volume
74
Issue
10
Pages
3056-3062
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2961594003
Cited by
88
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Scynexis
  • Inc
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
ibrexafungerp, invasive candidiasis, oral antifungal therapy, echinocandin therapy, step-down therapy, dosing regimen, population pharmacokinetics, fluconazole, micafungin, non-neutropenic patients, treatment efficacy and safety
MeSH terms
Micafungin, Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Female, Glycosides, Humans, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Triterpenes, Fluconazole, Echinocandins, Candidiasis, Invasive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review