Cited by 21Machine Learning in HealthcareDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchElectronic Health Records Systems

Unstructured clinical documentation reflecting cognitive and behavioral dysfunction: toward an EHR-based phenotype for cognitive impairment

Open access
Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Andrea L, Block, Laura M, Walljasper, Lily, Hill, Nikki, Gleason, Carey, Shah, Manish N·2018·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Despite increased risk for negative outcomes, cognitive impairment (CI) is greatly under-detected during hospitalization. While automated EHR-based phenotypes have potential to improve recognition of CI, they are hindered by widespread under-diagnosis of underlying etiologies such as dementia—limiting the utility of more precise structured data elements. This study examined unstructured data on symptoms of CI in the acute-care EHRs of hip and stroke fracture patients with dementia from two hospitals. Clinician reviewers identified and classified unstructured EHR data using standardized criteria. Relevant narrative text was descriptively characterized and evaluated for key terminology. Most patient EHRs (90%) had narrative text reflecting cognitive and/or behavioral dysfunction common in CI that were reliably classified (κ 0.82). The majority of statements reflected vague descriptions of cognitive/behavioral dysfunction as opposed to diagnostic terminology. Findings from this preliminary derivation study suggest that clinicians use specific terminology in unstructured EHR fields to describe common symptoms of CI. This terminology can inform the design of EHR-based phenotypes for CI and merits further investigation in more diverse, robustly characterized samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocy070

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This reduced confidence in their ability to identify and diagnose dementia, subsequently limiting the extent to which discharge planning reflected the patient's care needs (CMOC8).

    “This reduced confidence in their ability to identify and diagnose dementia, subsequently limiting the extent to which discharge planning reflected the patient’s care needs (CMOC8) [49, 50, 58, 79–82].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Introduction says clinicians face difficulties identifying cognitive impairment and distinguishing dementia from delirium during hospitalization. The Discussion says recognizing cognitive impairment at discharge has immediate implications for the care plan. Neither section reports reduced clinician confidence or shows that it caused discharge plans to reflect patients’ needs less well; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many HCPs, including geriatric specialists, lacked adequate dementia training.

    “Many HCPs, including geriatric specialists, lacked adequate dementia training [45, 50, 53, 58, 60, 72, 73, 77, 79–82].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies gaps in clinician knowledge and training as one challenge to recognizing cognitive impairment during hospitalization. The Discussion (page unavailable) says the documentation patterns may reflect inadequate training, but does not establish that many healthcare professionals lacked adequate dementia training or specifically identify geriatric specialists. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This was linked to inadequate cognitive screening, poor documentation, and hospital readmission.

    “This was linked to inadequate cognitive screening, poor documentation, and hospital readmission [49, 58, 79–82].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Introduction describes frequent under-detection of cognitive impairment, and the Discussion reports that some patients with dementia had no documentation of cognitive-impairment symptoms. Table 1 lists 30-day re-hospitalizations, but the paper does not link them to inadequate screening or poor documentation; it also does not directly assess whether cognitive screening was inadequate. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Healthcare professionals working outside of geriatric care were often unaware of dementia diagnoses.

    “As a result, HCPs working outside of geriatric care were often unaware of dementia diagnoses (CMOC14) [50, 53, 59, 66, 79, 86, 89].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Introduction (page not available) says cognitive impairment is frequently under-detected during hospitalization and that poor information transfer can make patients’ baseline cognitive status difficult to identify. The Discussion (page not available) suggests clinicians may document symptoms without recognizing their implications. Neither passage establishes that professionals outside geriatric care were often unaware of existing dementia diagnoses. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Literature included the use of non-standardised terminology or non-compliance with labelling medical records to indicate dementia.

    “Literature included the use of non-standardised terminology, (e.g., ‘confusion’, ‘cognitive impairment’) or non-compliance with labelling medical records to indicate dementia [45, 50, 79, 89].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilmore-Bykovskyi, A. L., Block, L. M., Walljasper, L., Hill, N., Gleason, C., & Shah, M. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2018-06-27
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
1206-1212
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2810209559
Cited by
21
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Hartford Centers of Gerontological Nursing Excellence
  • NIH-NIA
  • African Americans Fighting Alzheimer’s at Midlife (R01 AG054059)
  • Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Center (P50 AG033514)
  • Mentoring and Research in Patient-Oriented Geriatric Emergency Care (K24AG054560-01)
  • NIH
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
cognitive impairment, dementia, hip fracture, acute care, underdiagnosis, medical terminology
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Documentation, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Terminology as Topic, Retrospective Studies, International Classification of Diseases, Electronic Health Records, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review