The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternatives to Antibiotics for Organic Poultry Production
Open accessAbstract
There is a variety of potentially useful ingredients that could be added to the feed or drinking water of a poultry flock to improve production or to reduce the spread of disease. Some of these potential ingredients have been tested in live poultry flocks; others have only been tested in a laboratory without the use of live birds. Most of the potential ingredients need to be more thoroughly tested in live birds and in real production flocks before they are be completely embraced by poultry producers. With current consumer preferences tending toward purchasing products from livestock grown without antibiotics, the ingredients presented in this paper should be studied more thoroughly for the beneficial applications they may have in poultry production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts
Hammer, K. A., Carson, C. F., & Riley, T. V. (1999) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00780.x · Cited by 2,560
Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on Gram-negative bacteria
Helander, I. M., Alakomi, H.-L., Latva-Kala, K., Mattila-Sandholm, T., Pol, I., Smid, E. J., Gorris, L. G. M., & von Wright, A. (1998) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf980154m · Cited by 1,664
Antibacterial activity of some essential oil components against five foodborne pathogens
Kim, J., Marshall, M. R., & Wei, C.-I. (1995) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf00059a013 · Cited by 892 · cited 1×
“coli [36, 38].”
Sensitivity of food pathogens to garlic (Allium sativum)
Kumar, M., & Berwal, J. S. (1998) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00327.x · Cited by 176 · cited 2×
“Similarly, Kumer and Berwal [43] found that E.”
Background
Cited by
García, V., Catalá-Gregori, P., Hernández, F., Megías, M. D., & Madrid, J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Poultry Research · doi:10.3382/japr.2006-00116 · Cited by 394
Bai, K., Huang, Q., Zhang, J., He, J., Zhang, L., & Wang, T. (2017) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps/pew246 · Cited by 339
V. T. Nair, D., Venkitanarayanan, K., & Kollanoor Johny, A. (2018) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods7100167 · Cited by 336
Mehdipour, Z., Afsharmanesh, M., & Sami, M. (2013) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2013.03.014 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Griggs, J. P., & Jacob, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Poultry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 750-756
- ISSN
- 1056-6171 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117050175
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternatives to Antibiotics for Organic Poultry Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/japr/14.4.750
- The paper
- Griggs, J. P., & Jacob, J. P. (2005). Alternatives to Antibiotics for Organic Poultry Production. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/14.4.750
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
