Cited by 81International Business and FDIInnovation and Knowledge ManagementGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact

Subsidiary capability upgrading under emerging market acquirers

Open access
He, Shaowei, Khan, Zaheer, Shenkar, Oded·2018·Journal of World Business

Abstract

This article leverages a case study of a recent Chinese acquisition in the United Kingdom to explore the upgrading of capabilities in the subsidiaries in developed countries acquired by emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs). The seemingly implausible upgrading phenomenon is explained by the EMNEs’ complementary assets, their GVC lead firm positions and the unique power relationship between the acquirer and acquired firms, which enable the EMNEs to ‘impel’ upgrading and encourage ‘co-learning’ in their acquired subsidiaries. The contributions to the literature on EMNEs, global value chains, and organizational learning are outlined and discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jwb.2017.11.006

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lead firms can impel capability upgrading on peripheral units by leveraging their central positions and complementary assets.

    “Lead firms can impel capability upgrading on peripheral units by leveraging their central positions and complementary assets, as indicated by the acquisition of UK-based Dynex by China's Times Electric (He, Khan, & Shenkar, 2018).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as He, Khan, & Shenkar, 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 106 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. London: Sage Publications.
  3. Williamson, P. J., & Raman, A. P. (2011). How China reset its global acquisition agenda. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 109-114.
  4. Yin, E., & Williamson, P. J. (2011). Rethinking innovation for a recovery. Ivey Business Journal(May/June) [Online Edition].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, S., Khan, Z., & Shenkar, O.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong University Of Finances and Economics (CN)
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
He, Shaowei
Venue
Journal of World Business
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
248-262
ISSN
1090-9516 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772833867
Cited by
81
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of World Business (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • NECTAR - Northampton Electronic Collection of Thesis and Research (University of Northampton) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Leverhulme/British Academy Small Research Grant (SG142848)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Keywords
emerging market multinationals, Chinese acquisitions, global value chains, co-learning, complementary assets, organizational learning, cross-border acquisitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review