Cited by 45Palliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Euthanasia in Belgium: Shortcomings of the Law and Its Application and of the Monitoring of Practice

Raus, Kasper, Vanderhaegen, Bert, Sterckx, Sigrid·2021·The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine

Abstract

In 2002 with the passing of the Euthanasia Law, Belgium became one of the few countries worldwide to legalize euthanasia. In the 18 years since the passing of the law, much has changed. We argue that in Belgium a widening of the use of euthanasia is occurring and that this can be ethically and legally problematic. This is in part related to the fact that several legal requirements intended to operate as safeguards and procedural guarantees in reality often fail to operate as such. We focus on three kinds of safeguards or procedural guarantees: (1) the legally defined due care criteria for eligibility for euthanasia; (2) the consultation of a second (and sometimes third) physician; and (3) the reporting of euthanasia cases to the Federal Control and Evaluation Commission for Euthanasia. We will show how each of these three safeguards can exhibit shortcomings in theory and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jmp/jhaa031

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raus, K., Vanderhaegen, B., & Sterckx, S.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Raus, Kasper
Venue
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine
Published
2021-01-25
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
80-107
ISSN
  • 0360-5310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5019
OpenAlex
W3123568793
Cited by
45
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
euthanasia, euthanasia legislation, Belgium, legal protection, procedural guarantees, ethics of euthanasia
MeSH terms
Belgium, Euthanasia, Humans, Physicians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review