Cited by 829Endometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances

Altered PTEN Expression as a Diagnostic Marker for the Earliest Endometrial Precancers

Mutter, G. L.·2000·Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

Background PTEN tumor suppressor gene mutations are the most frequent genetic lesions in endometrial adenocarcinomas of the endometrioid subtype. Testing the hypothesis that altered PTEN function precedes the appearance of endometrial adenocarcinoma has been difficult, however, partly because of uncertainties in precancer diagnosis. Methods Two series of endometrial cancer and precancer (endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, as diagnosed by computerized morphometric analysis) tissue samples were studied, one for PTEN mutations by the use of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and another for PTEN protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Endometria altered by high estrogen levels that are unopposed by progestins-conditions known to increase cancer risk-were also studied by immunohistochemistry. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results The PTEN mutation rate was 83% (25 of 30) in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas and 55% (16 of 29) in precancers, and the difference in number of mutations was statistically significant (two-sided P =.025). No normal endometria showed PTEN mutations. Although most precancers and cancers had a mutation in only one PTEN allele, endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas showed complete loss of PTEN protein expression in 61% (20 of 33) of cases, and 97% (32 of 33) showed at least some diminution in expression. Cancers and most precancers exhibited contiguous groups of PTEN-negative glands, while endometria altered b…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/92.11.924

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mutter, G. L.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Mutter, G. L.
Venue
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2000-06-07
Volume
92
Issue
11
Pages
924-930
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2113190292
Cited by
829
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 45
FWCI
39.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Keywords
PTEN, endometrial adenocarcinoma, endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, tumor suppressor mutations, endometrial carcinogenesis, unopposed estrogen, precancerous lesions, diagnostic biomarkers, endometrioid carcinoma
MeSH terms
Diagnosis, Differential, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases, Precancerous Conditions, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Genes, Tumor Suppressor, Endometrial Neoplasms, DNA Primers, Germ-Line Mutation, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, PTEN Phosphohydrolase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review