The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outcome and Predictors of Functional Recovery 5 Years Following Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to examine functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury (TBI) during early childhood, to investigate impairments up to 5 years postinjury and identify predictors of outcome. METHODS: The study compared three groups of children (mild = 11, moderate = 22, severe = 15), aged 2.0-6.11 years at injury, to a healthy control group (n = 17). Using a prospective, longitudinal design, adaptive abilities, behavior, and family functioning were investigated acutely, 6, 30 months and 5 years postinjury, with educational progress investigated at 30 months and 5 years postinjury. RESULTS: A strong association was suggested between injury severity and outcomes across all domains. Further, 5-year outcomes in adaptive and behavioral domains were best predicted by preinjury levels of child function, and educational performance by injury severity. CONCLUSION: Children who sustain a severe TBI in early childhood are at greatest risk of long-term impairment in day-to-day skills in the long-term postinjury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While functional outcomes (e.g., adaptive functioning) typically predict outcomes after childhood TBI (Anderson et al., 2012; Catroppa et al., 2008; Ryan et al., 2015), they did not do so in this young adult group, highlighting the need for further research on these relationships in adulthood.”
From Psychosocial outcomes in young adults with childhood traumatic brain injury: A 20‐year follow‐up study (2026) · cites this paper as Catroppa et al., 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Cited by
Semple, B. D., Blomgren, K., Gimlin, K., Ferriero, D. M., & Noble-Haeusslein, L. J. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.001 · Cited by 2,132
Anderson, V., Godfrey, C., Rosenfeld, J. V., & Catroppa, C. (2012) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0311 · Cited by 224
Self-citationAnderson, V., Brown, S., Newitt, H., & Hoile, H. (2011) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0021217 · Cited by 180
Self-citationCrowe, L. M., Catroppa, C., Babl, F. E., & Anderson, V. (2012) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0438 · Cited by 119
Self-citationSelective Changes in Executive Functioning Ten Years After Severe Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury
Beauchamp, M., Catroppa, C., Godfrey, C., Morse, S., Rosenfeld, J. V., & Anderson, V. (2011) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565641.2011.555572 · Cited by 104
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Catroppa, C., Anderson, V. A., Morse, S. A., Haritou, F., & Rosenfeld, J. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Psychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-02-23
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 707-718
- ISSN
- 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2107233898
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome and Predictors of Functional Recovery 5 Years Following Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jpepsy/jsn006
- The paper
- Catroppa, C., Anderson, V. A., Morse, S. A., Haritou, F., & Rosenfeld, J. V. (2008). Outcome and Predictors of Functional Recovery 5 Years Following Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Journal of Pediatric Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsn006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.