The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to Select, Calculate, and Interpret Effect Sizes
Abstract
The objective of this article is to offer guidelines regarding the selection, calculation, and interpretation of effect sizes (ESs). To accomplish this goal, ESs are first defined and their important contribution to research is emphasized. Then different types of ESs commonly used in group and correlational studies are discussed. Several useful resources are provided for distinguishing among different types of effects and what modifications might be required in their calculation depending on a study's purpose and methods. This article should assist producers and consumers of research in understanding the role, importance, and meaning of ESs in research reports.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Things I have learned (so far).
Cohen, J. (1990) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.12.1304 · Cited by 1,781
Cohen, J. (1983) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168300700301 · Cited by 1,564 · cited 5×
“Many authors still routinely refer to Cohen’s (1988) comments made in reference to power analysis that SMDs of 0.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPrimary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review
Durlak, J. A., & Wells, A. M. (1997) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1024654026646 · Cited by 963
Self-citationSchool-Based Interventions for Aggressive and Disruptive Behavior
Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.011 · Cited by 783
A probability-based measure of effect size: Robustness to base rates and other factors.
Ruscio, J. (2008) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.13.1.19 · Cited by 398
Cited by
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x · Cited by 10,854
Self-citationDurlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6 · Cited by 1,216
Self-citationJeong, J., Franchett, E. E., Ramos de Oliveira, C. V., Rehmani, K., & Yousafzai, A. K. (2021) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003602 · Cited by 903
The Patient-Centered Medical Home: A Systematic Review
Jackson, G. L., Powers, B. J., Chatterjee, R., Prvu Bettger, J., Kemper, A. R., Hasselblad, V., Dolor, R. J., Irvine, R. J., Heidenfelder, B. L., Kendrick, A. S., et al. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00579 · Cited by 699
Harrer, M., Adam, S. H., Baumeister, H., Cuijpers, P., Karyotaki, E., Auerbach, R. P., Kessler, R. C., Bruffaerts, R., Berking, M., & Ebert, D. D. (2019) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.1759 · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Durlak, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Psychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-02-16
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 917-928
- ISSN
- 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2152193038
- Cited by
- 1,446
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 17.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to Select, Calculate, and Interpret Effect Sizes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004
- The paper
- Durlak, J. A. (2009). How to Select, Calculate, and Interpret Effect Sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
