Cited by 213Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

Surviving cancer competently intervention program (SCCIP): a cognitive-behavioral and family therapy intervention for adolescent survivors of childhood cancer and their families.

KAZAK, ANNE E., SIMMS, STEVEN, BARAKAT, LAMIA, HOBBIE, WENDY, FOLEY, BERNADETTE, GOLOMB, VALERIE, BEST, MARY·1999·Family Process

Abstract

Psychological reactions to having had childhood cancer often continue after treatment ends, for survivors and their parents. Based on our previous research, we developed an intervention program for adolescent survivors of childhood cancer, their parents, and siblings. Surviving Cancer Competently: An Intervention Program--SCCIP--is a one-day family group intervention that combines cognitive-behavioral and family therapy approaches. The goals of SCCIP are to reduce symptoms of distress and to improve family functioning and development. SCCIP is described and data from a pilot study of 19 families are presented. Program evaluation data indicated that all family members found SCCIP helpful. Standardized measures administered before the intervention and again at 6 months after SCCIP showed that symptoms of posttraumatic stress and anxiety decreased. Changes in family functioning were more difficult to discern. Overall, the results were promising with regard to the feasibility of the program and its potential for reducing symptoms of distress for all family members.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00176.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KAZAK, A. E., SIMMS, S., BARAKAT, L., HOBBIE, W., FOLEY, B., GOLOMB, V., & BEST, M.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
KAZAK, ANNE E.
Venue
Family Process
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-06
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
176-191
ISSN
  • 0014-7370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-5300
OpenAlex
W2098301664
Cited by
213
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Family Process (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (63930)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
childhood cancer survivors, adolescent survivors, family therapy, cognitive-behavioral intervention, post-traumatic stress, anxiety, family functioning, siblings, parents, psychological distress, intervention feasibility
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Anxiety, Child, Family, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review