Cited by 110School Health and Nursing EducationPhysical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Systematic review and meta-analysis of health promotion interventions for children and adolescents using an ecological framework

Open access
Cushing, C. C., Brannon, E. E., Suorsa, K. I., Wilson, D. K.·2014·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and quantify the evidence for health promotion interventions in children and adolescents. METHOD: 96 independent samples of smoking, physical activity, and diet studies were included. Outcomes included both objective and self-reports of health behavior, as well as proxy measures such as fitness. RESULTS: The aggregated effect was significant (g = .20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-0.32, n = 96). A significant effect of intervention was observed at approximately 1-year follow-up (g = .07, 95% CI = 0.02-0.14, n = 20). The greatest risk of bias was failure to blind outcome assessment, which occurred in 21% of studies. Most studies lacked sufficient detail to determine the quality of their randomization sequence (58%). Additional concerns about risk of bias for individual studies were minimal. Overall, the quality of this finding was moderate using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. CONCLUSION: Health promotion interventions are effective for modifying health behavior; however, effect sizes are small.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu042

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Higgins J P T, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.1.0) 2011. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. Retrieved from http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cushing, C. C., Brannon, E. E., Suorsa, K. I., & Wilson, D. K.
Affiliations
Oklahoma State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2014-06-16
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
949-962
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2159424492
Cited by
110
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD072153)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
health promotion interventions, children, adolescents, ecological model, smoking prevention, physical activity, diet, health behavior change, risk of bias, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Child, Diet, Health Promotion, Humans, Smoking, Health Behavior, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review