The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling
Abstract
Journal Article Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling Get access Reg Baker, Reg Baker Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar J. Michael Brick, J. Michael Brick * *Address correspondence to J. Michael Brick, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD 20850, USA; E-mail: mikebrick@westat.com. Joseph Sedransk served as the Editor for this report, the comments, and the rejoinder since Roger Tourangeau was a member of the Task Force. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Nancy A. Bates, Nancy A. Bates Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Mike Battaglia, Mike Battaglia Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Mick P. Couper, Mick P. Couper Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Jill A. Dever, Jill A. Dever Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Krista J. Gile, Krista J. Gile Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Roger Tourangeau Roger Tourangeau Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, Volume 1, Issue 2, November 2013, Pages 90–143, https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008 Published: 26 September 2013
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys
Groves, R. M. (2006) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfl033 · Cited by 2,420
Sears, D. O. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.3.515 · Cited by 2,119
Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling
Deville, J.-C., & Särndal, C.-E. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1992.10475217 · Cited by 1,735
For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis
Rubin, D. B. (2008) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/08-aoas187 · Cited by 831
Cited by
Coppock, A., & McClellan, O. A. (2019) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168018822174 · Cited by 987
Inference for Nonprobability Samples
Elliott, M. R., & Valliant, R. (2017) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/16-sts598 · Cited by 331
Predictive biases in natural language processing models: A conceptual framework and overview
Shah, D. S., Schwartz, H. A., & Hovy, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.468 · Cited by 241
Demographic research with non-representative internet data
Zagheni, E., & Weber, I. (2015) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-12-2014-0261 · Cited by 119
Graham, A., Pickett, J. T., & Cullen, F. T. (2021) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128720977439 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, R., Brick, J. M., Bates, N. A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., Gile, K. J., & Tourangeau, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-09-26
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 90-143
- ISSN
- 2325-0984 (ISSN-L)
- 2325-0992
- OpenAlex
- W2100420630
- Cited by
- 652
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jssam/smt008
- The paper
- Baker, R., Brick, J. M., Bates, N. A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., Gile, K. J., & Tourangeau, R. (2013). Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
