The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Handbook of Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology (DRAFT)
Abstract
Abstract This title is a practical guide to carrying out research in health psychology and clinical psychology. It bridges the gap between undergraduate and postgraduate study. As well as describing the various techniques and methods available to students, it provides them with a proper understanding of what a specific technique does - going beyond the introductory descriptions typical of most undergraduate methods books. The volume describes both quantitative and qualitative approaches to data collection, providing valuable advice on methods ranging from psychometric testing to discourse analysis. For both undergraduate and postgraduate students, the book will be essential in making them aware of the full range of techniques available, helping them to design scientifically rigorous experiments, and effectively analyse their results.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Two investigators (J.S.M-H., K.L.K.) independently analyzed all email summaries [38,39].”
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV)
Hu, R. J. (2003) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-12-226870-9/01070-4 · Cited by 9,168
Basic principles of ROC analysis
Metz, C. E. (1978) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0001-2998(78)80014-2 · Cited by 6,122
Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems
Lord, F. M. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203056615 · Cited by 5,009
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562 · Cited by 3,419
Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory
van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6 · Cited by 2,323
Experiences of depression in normal young adults.
Blatt, S. J., D'Affitti, J. P., & Quinlan, D. M. (1976) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.85.4.383 · Cited by 1,132
Hertzog, C., Van Alstine, J., Usala, P. D., Hultsch, D. F., & Dixon, R. (1990) · Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.2.1.64 · Cited by 452
Shortening the CES-D to improve its ability to detect cases of depression.
Santor, D. A., & Coyne, J. C. (1997) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.9.3.233 · Cited by 422
Examining scale discriminability in the BDI and CES-D as a function of depressive severity.
Santor, D. A., Zuroff, D. C., Ramsay, J. O., Cervantes, P., & Palacios, J. E. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.2.131 · Cited by 378
The Measurement Structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
Sheehan, T. J., Fifield, J., Reisine, S., & Tennen, H. A. (1995) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6403_9 · Cited by 344
LeBlanc, J. C., Almudevar, A., Brooks, S. J., & Kutcher, S. (2002) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1089/104454602760219153 · Cited by 168
FOCUS ARTICLE: Eight Decades of Measurement in Depression
Santor, D., Gregus, M., & Welch, A. (2006) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0403_1 · Cited by 161
Analysis of effects of sex and age in response to items on the CES-D scale
Clark, V. A., Aneshensel, C. S., Frerichs, R. R., & Morgan, T. M. (1981) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(81)90047-0 · Cited by 149
Tennen, H. A., Hall, J. A., & Affleck, G. G. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.870 · Cited by 130
Reconstruction and Validation of the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire
Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A., Joffe, R. T., & Buis, T. (1994) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191194001001009 · Cited by 122
The Depressive Experiences Questionnaire: Revision and Validation
Welkowitz, J., Lish, J. D., & Bond, R. N. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_17 · Cited by 112
The relations between observer-rating and self-report of depressive symptomatology.
Sayer, N. A., Sackeïm, H. A., Moeller, J. R., Prudic, J., Devanand, D. P., Coleman, E. A., & Kiersky, J. E. (1993) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.5.3.350 · Cited by 95
Verdier-Taillefer, M. H., Gourlet, V., Fuhrer, R., et al. (2001) · Neuroepidemiology · doi:10.1159/000054800 · Cited by 80
Wong, Y.-L. I. (2000) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.69 · Cited by 65
Evaluating the continuity of symptomatology between depressed and nondepressed individuals.
Santor, D. A., & Coyne, J. C. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.110.2.216 · Cited by 59
Rigor, but not rigor mortis, in depression research.
Kendall, P. C., & Flannery-Schroeder, E. C. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.68.5.892 · Cited by 43
Depression research in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: A reply.
Weary, G., Edwards, J. A., & Jacobson, J. A. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.885 · Cited by 40
Rigor, rigor mortis, and conspiratorial views of depression research.
Tennen, H. A., Hall, J. A., & Affleck, G. G. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.68.5.895 · Cited by 18
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gonzalo, J. D., Wolpaw, D. R., Krok, K. L., Pfeiffer, M. P., & McCall-Hosenfeld, J. S. (2019) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2019.1591256 · Cited by 39
Uansri, S., Kunpeuk, W., Julchoo, S., Sinam, P., Phaiyarom, M., & Suphanchaimat, R. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20105781 · Cited by 23
Kekecs, Z., Moss, D., Whorwell, P. J., Varga, K., Terhune, D. B., Shenefelt, P. D., Palsson, O. S., Benedittis, G. D., & Elkins, G. (2024) · Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1177/2515690x241274538 · Cited by 12
Eilert, N., Timulak, L., Duffy, D., Earley, C., Enrique, A., Kennedy, P., McCormack, C., Palacios, J., Wogan, R., & Richards, D. (2022) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2619 · Cited by 11
Hanlon, I., Hewitt, C., Evans, S., Taylor, J., Selinger, C., & Mikocka-Walus, A. (2022) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105320945001 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2005-06
- OpenAlex
- W634791032
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- research methodology, health psychology, clinical psychology, quantitative data collection, qualitative data collection, psychometric assessment, discourse analysis, experimental design, data analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
