The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution of the Hubble sequence in hierarchical models for galaxy formation
Open accessAbstract
We present a model for the broad morphological distinction between the disk and spheroidal components of galaxies. Elaborating on the hierarchical clustering scheme of galaxy formation proposed by Cole et al., we assume that galaxies form stars quiescently in a disk until they are disrupted into a spheroidal configuration by mergers. We calculate formation and merging histories, and the evolution in colour, luminosity and morphology of the galaxy populations in different environments. Roughly $ 50\ %$ of ellipticals in our model have undergone a major merger since $z = 0.5$, yet in spite of this we find that cluster ellipticals have colour-magnitude diagrams with remarkably small scatter. The morphological mix of galaxies that become rich cluster members at high redshift is dominated by spiral galaxies, due to the long timescale for galaxy mergers compared with the timescale for cluster assembly at high redshift. The assembly of low redshift clusters is slower, allowing more galaxy mergers to occur in the progenitor halos. As a result $z=0$ rich clusters become E/S0 dominated and we find a ``Butcher-Oemler'' effect that becomes weaker for poorer groups at high redshift. The field luminosity function of red galaxies shows little evolution out to $z\simeq 1$ and the reddest galaxies at these redshifts are as bright as their local counterparts. The blue luminosity function, on the other hand, evolves rapidly with redshift, increasing its characteristic luminosity and becoming steeper at the faint end. These trends are similar to those recently observed in the Canada-France Redshift Survey.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Where Are the Missing Galactic Satellites?
Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307643 · Cited by 2,741
Populating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at \fontshape{it}{z}=0
Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Tormen, G., & Kauffmann, G. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04912.x · Cited by 2,707
Cole, S., Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M., & Frenk, C. S. (2002) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03879.x · Cited by 1,952
Self-citationThe New Galaxy: Signatures of Its Formation
Freeman, K., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840 · Cited by 1,160
Clustering of galaxies in a hierarchical universe -- I. Methods and results at z = 0
Kauffmann, G., Colberg, J. M., Diaferio, A., & White, S. D. M. (1999) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02202.x · Cited by 965
Metadata
- Authors
- Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., & Frenk, C. S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-12-11
- Volume
- 283
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1361-1378
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2135561086
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of the Hubble sequence in hierarchical models for galaxy formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/283.4.1361
- The paper
- Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., & Frenk, C. S. (1996). Evolution of the Hubble sequence in hierarchical models for galaxy formation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/283.4.1361
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.