Cited by 23Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The orbital phase space of contracted dark matter haloes

Open access
Callingham, Thomas M, Cautun, Marius, Deason, Alis J, Frenk, Carlos S, Grand, Robert J J, Marinacci, Federico, Pakmor, Ruediger·2020·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We study the orbital phase space of dark matter (DM) haloes in the auriga suite of cosmological hydrodynamics simulations of Milky Way (MW) analogues. We characterize haloes by their spherical action distribution, $F\left(J_{{r}},L\right)$, a function of the specific angular momentum, L, and the radial action, Jr, of the DM particles. By comparing DM-only and hydrodynamical simulations of the same haloes, we investigate the contraction of DM haloes caused by the accumulation of baryons at the centre. We find a small systematic suppression of the radial action in the DM haloes of the hydrodynamical simulations, suggesting that the commonly used adiabatic contraction approximation can result in an underestimate of the density by $\sim 8{{ \rm {per\ cent}}}$. We apply an iterative algorithm to contract the auriga DM haloes given a baryon density profile and halo mass, recovering the true contracted DM profiles with an accuracy of $\sim 15{{ \rm {per\ cent}}}$, that reflects halo-to-halo variation. Using this algorithm, we infer the total mass profile of the MW’s contracted DM halo. We derive updated values for the key astrophysical inputs to DM direct detection experiments: the DM density and velocity distribution in the Solar neighbourhood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/staa1089

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For MW and higher mass haloes, the effect of baryons on the DM halo is well described by the adiabatic contraction model, in which baryons slowly accumulate at the halo centre and the DM distribution distorts such that its action integrals remain approximately constant.

    “For MW and higher mass haloes, the effect of baryons on the DM halo is well described by the adiabatic contraction model (Callingham et al. 2020), in which baryons slowly accumulate at the halo centre and the DM distribution distorts in such a way that its action integrals remain approximately constant”

    From The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2 (2020) · cites this paper as Callingham et al. 2020

  • The response of the DM halo to the assembly of its galaxy can be predicted to good approximation using the adiabatic contraction method with same action integrals.

    “The response of the DM halo to the assembly of its galaxy can be predicted to good approximation using the adiabatic contraction method in which the DM distribution is assumed to have the same action integrals in the hydrodynamic run as in the DMO case (Sellwood & McGaugh 2005; Callingham et al. 2020”

    From The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2 (2020) · cites this paper as Callingham et al. 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Callingham, T. M., Cautun, M., Deason, A. J., Frenk, C. S., Grand, R. J. J., Marinacci, F., & Pakmor, R.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
Corresponding author
Callingham, Thomas M
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2020-04-24
Volume
495
Issue
1
Pages
12-28
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W3000762801
Cited by
23
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/F001166/1, ST/I00162X/1, ST/P000541/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/K003267/1)
  • ERC (GA 786910)
  • EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (794474)
  • MIUR
  • BIS (ST/K00042X/1)
  • Durham University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
dark matter halos, specific angular momentum, radial action, Milky Way dark matter halo, solar neighborhood, Auriga simulations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review