Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards a more realistic population of bright spiral galaxies in cosmological simulations

Open access
Aumer, Michael, White, Simon D. M., Naab, Thorsten, Scannapieco, Cecilia·2013·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present an update to the multiphase smoothed particle hydrodynamics galaxy formation code by Scannapieco et al. We include a more elaborate treatment of the production of metals, cooling rates based on individual element abundances and a scheme for the turbulent diffusion of metals. Our supernova feedback model now transfers energy to the interstellar medium (ISM) in kinetic and thermal form, and we include a prescription for the effects of radiation pressure from massive young stars on the ISM. We calibrate our new code on the well-studied Aquarius haloes and then use it to simulate a sample of 16 galaxies with halo masses between 1 × 1011 and 3 × 1012 M⊙. In general, the stellar masses of the sample agree well with the stellar mass to halo mass relation inferred from abundance matching techniques for redshifts z = 0–4. There is however a tendency to overproduce stars at z > 4 and to underproduce them at z < 0.5 in the least massive haloes. Overly high star formation rates (SFRs) at z < 1 for the most massive haloes are likely connected to the lack of active galactic nuclei feedback in our model. The simulated sample also shows reasonable agreement with observed SFRs, sizes, gas fractions and gas-phase metallicities at z = 0–3. Remaining discrepancies can be connected to deviations from predictions for star formation histories from abundance matching. At z = 0, the model galaxies show realistic morphologies, stellar surface density profiles, circular velocity curves and stellar metallicities, but overly flat metallicity gradients. 15 out of 16 of our galaxies contain disc components with kinematic disc fraction ranging between 15 and 65 per cent. The disc fraction depends on the time of the last destructive merger or misaligned infall event. Considering the remaining shortcomings of our simulations we conclude that even higher kinematic disc fractions may be possible for Λ cold dark matter haloes with quiet merger histories, such as the Aquarius haloes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stt1230

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Aumer, M., White, S. D. M., Naab, T., & Scannapieco, C.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2013-08-08
Volume
434
Issue
4
Pages
3142-3164
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2101126755
Cited by
271
References
4
FWCI
20.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a more realistic population of bright spiral galaxies in cosmological simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stt1230
The paper
Aumer, M., White, S. D. M., Naab, T., & Scannapieco, C. (2013). Towards a more realistic population of bright spiral galaxies in cosmological simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1230

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.