Cited by 52Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

Mining for Strong Gravitational Lenses with Self-supervised Learning

Open access
Stein, George, Blaum, Jacqueline, Harrington, Peter, Medan, Tomislav, Lukić, Zarija·2022·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We employ self-supervised representation learning to distill information from 76 million galaxy images from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Legacy Imaging Surveys’ Data Release 9. Targeting the identification of new strong gravitational lens candidates, we first create a rapid similarity search tool to discover new strong lenses given only a single labeled example. We then show how training a simple linear classifier on the self-supervised representations, requiring only a few minutes on a CPU, can automatically classify strong lenses with great efficiency. We present 1192 new strong lens candidates that we identified through a brief visual identification campaign and release an interactive web-based similarity search tool and the top network predictions to facilitate crowd-sourcing rapid discovery of additional strong gravitational lenses and other rare objects: github.com/georgestein/ssl-legacysurvey.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6d63

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once the encoder section of a self-supervised model has been trained, one can conduct a simple similarity search to find objects of interest, or apply a linear classifier directly onto the encoder's outputs to separate the data into a variety of classes.

    “Hayat et al. (2021) and Stein et al. (2022) show that once the encoder section of a self-supervised model has been trained one can conduct a simple similarity search to find objects of interest, or apply a linear classifier directly onto the encoder's outputs to separate the data into a variety of classes.”

    From Detecting galaxy tidal features using self-supervised representation learning (2024) · cites this paper as Stein et al. 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. 2020, in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE), 9729
  2. Hendrycks, D., Mazeika, M., Kadavath, S., & Song, D. 2019, arXiv:1906. 12340
  3. Jacobs, C., Collett, T., Glazebrook, K., et al. 2019b, ApJS, 243, 17 · DOI
  4. Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., et al. 2019, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, ed. H. Wallach et al. (Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates Inc.), 8024
  5. Reed, C. J., Metzger, S., Srinivas, A., Darrell, T., & Keutzer, K. 2020, arXiv:2009.07724 · arXiv
  6. Rojas, K., Savary, E., Clément, B., et al. 2021, arXiv:2109.00014 · arXiv
  7. Stein, G., Harrington, P., Blaum, J., Medan, T., & Lukic, Z. 2021, arXiv:2110. 13151
  8. Zhai, X., Oliver, A., Kolesnikov, A., & Beyer, L. 2019, in Proc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. on Computer Vision (ICCV) (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE), 1476

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, G., Blaum, J., Harrington, P., Medan, T., & Lukić, Z.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
  • Stein, George
  • Blaum, Jacqueline
  • Harrington, Peter
  • Medan, Tomislav
  • Lukić, Zarija
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2022-06-01
Volume
932
Issue
2
Pages
107
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W3202552603
Cited by
52
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0007914)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
strong gravitational lenses, self-supervised representation learning, similarity search, linear classifiers, DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys, galaxy images, crowdsourcing, rare object detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review