Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 477

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves

Open access
Oman, Kyle A., Navarro, Julio F., Fattahi, Azadeh, Frenk, Carlos S., Sawala, Till, White, Simon D. M., Bower, Richard, Crain, Robert A., Furlong, Michelle, Schaller, Matthieu, Schaye, Joop, Theuns, Tom·2015·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We examine the circular velocity profiles of galaxies in Λ cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological hydrodynamical simulations from the EAGLE and LOCAL GROUPS projects and compare them with a compilation of observed rotation curves of galaxies spanning a wide range in mass. The shape of the circular velocity profiles of simulated galaxies varies systematically as a function of galaxy mass, but shows remarkably little variation at fixed maximum circular velocity. This is especially true for low-mass dark-matter-dominated systems, reflecting the expected similarity of the underlying CDM haloes. This is at odds with observed dwarf galaxies, which show a large diversity of rotation curve shapes, even at fixed maximum rotation speed. Some dwarfs have rotation curves that agree well with simulations, others do not. The latter are systems where the inferred mass enclosed in the inner regions is much lower than expected for CDM haloes and include many galaxies where previous work claims the presence of a constant density ‘core’. The ‘cusp versus core’ issue is thus better characterized as an ‘inner mass deficit’ problem than as a density slope mismatch. For several galaxies, the magnitude of this inner mass deficit is well in excess of that reported in recent simulations where cores result from baryon-induced fluctuations in the gravitational potential. We conclude that one or more of the following statements must be true: (i) the dark matter is more complex than envisaged by any current model; (ii) current simulations fail to reproduce the diversity in the effects of baryons on the inner regions of dwarf galaxies; and/or (iii) the mass profiles of ‘inner mass deficit’ galaxies inferred from kinematic data are incorrect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stv1504

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Cited by

See all 477

Metadata

Authors
Oman, K. A., Navarro, J. F., Fattahi, A., Frenk, C. S., Sawala, T., White, S. D. M., Bower, R., Crain, R. A., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Schaye, J., & Theuns, T.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2015-08-06
Volume
452
Issue
4
Pages
3650-3665
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2146651836
Cited by
477
References
78
FWCI
20.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stv1504
The paper
Oman, K. A., Navarro, J. F., Fattahi, A., Frenk, C. S., Sawala, T., White, S. D. M., Bower, R., Crain, R. A., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Schaye, J., & Theuns, T. (2015). The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.