Cited by 407Astrophysics and Star Formation StudiesStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

The star formation history and accretion-disc fraction among the K-type members of the Scorpius–Centaurus OB association

Open access
Pecaut, Mark J., Mamajek, Eric E.·2016·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present results of a spectroscopic survey for new K- and M-type members of Scorpius–Centaurus (Sco–Cen), the nearest OB Association (∼100–200 pc). Using an X-ray, proper motion and colour–magnitude selected sample, we obtained spectra for 361 stars, for which we report spectral classifications and Li and Hα equivalent widths. We identified 156 new members of Sco–Cen, and recovered 51 previously published members. We have combined these with previously known members to form a sample of 493 solar-mass (∼0.7–1.3 M⊙) members of Sco–Cen. We investigated the star formation history of this sample, and re-assessed the ages of the massive main-sequence turn-off and the G-type members in all three subgroups. We performed a census for circumstellar discs in our sample using WISE infrared data and find a protoplanetary disc fraction for K-type stars of 4.4|$^{+1.6}_{-0.9}$| per cent for Upper Centaurus-Lupus and Lower Centaurus-Crux at ∼16 Myr and 9.0|$^{+4.0}_{-2.2}$| per cent for Upper Scorpius at ∼10 Myr. These data are consistent with a protoplanetary disc e-folding time-scale of ∼4–5 Myr for ∼1 M⊙ stars, twice that previously quoted, but consistent with the Bell et al. revised age scale of young clusters. Finally, we construct an age map of Scorpius–Centaurus which clearly reveals substructure consisting of concentrations of younger and older stars. We find evidence for strong age gradients within all three subgroups. None of the subgroups are consistent with being simple, coeval populations which formed in single bursts, but likely represents a multitude of smaller star formation episodes of hundreds to tens of stars each.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stw1300

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pecaut, M. J., & Mamajek, E. E.
Affiliations
  • Rockhurst University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Pecaut, Mark J.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2016-06-15
Volume
461
Issue
1
Pages
794-815
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1656352035
Cited by
407
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 4
FWCI
19.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1313029, 1008908)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
Scorpius-Centaurus OB association, star formation history, protoplanetary disks, K-type stars, M-type stars, Upper Centaurus Lupus, Lower Centaurus Crux, Upper Scorpius, stellar ages, age gradient, multiple star formation episodes, lithium equivalent width, H-alpha equivalent width, young stellar populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review