Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Planetary giant impacts: convergence of high-resolution simulations using efficient spherical initial conditions and swift

Kegerreis, J A, Eke, V R, Gonnet, P, Korycansky, D G, Massey, R J, Schaller, M, Teodoro, L F A·2019·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We perform simulations of giant impacts on to the young Uranus using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with over 100 million particles. This 100–1000 × improvement in particle number reveals that simulations with below 107 particles fail to converge on even bulk properties such as the post-impact rotation period, or on the detailed erosion of the atmosphere. Higher resolutions appear to determine these large-scale results reliably, but even 108 particles may not be sufficient to study the detailed composition of the debris – finding that almost an order of magnitude more rock is ejected beyond the Roche radius than with 105 particles. We present two software developments that enable this increase in the feasible number of particles. First, we present an algorithm to place any number of particles in a spherical shell such that they all have an SPH density within 1 per cent of the desired value. Particles in model planets built from these nested shells have a root-mean-squared velocity below 1 per cent of the escape speed, which avoids the need for long precursor simulations to produce relaxed initial conditions. Secondly, we develop the hydrodynamics code sph with interdependent fine-grained tasking(swift) for planetary simulations. swift uses task-based parallelism and other modern algorithmic approaches to take full advantage of contemporary supercomputer architectures. Both the particle placement code and swift are publicly released.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stz1606

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Balsara, 1995, J. Comput. Phys., 121, 357, 10.1016/S0021-9991(95)90221-X · DOI · Paper page
  2. Benz, 1986, Icarus, 66, 515, 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90088-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Borrow, 2018, Proc. of 13th SPHERIC International Workshop, 44
  4. Ćuk, 2012, Science, 338, 1047, 10.1126/science.1225542 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cullen, 2010, MNRAS, 408, 669, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17158.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dehnen, 2012, MNRAS, 425, 1068, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21439.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. Deng, 2019, ApJ, 870, 127, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf399 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Diehl, 2015, Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust., 32, e048, 10.1017/pasa.2015.50 · doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.50
  9. Genda, 2015, Icarus, 262, 58, 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.029 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gonnet, 2015, SIAM J Sci. Comput., 37, C95, 10.1137/140964266 · doi:10.1137/140964266
  11. Herant, 1994, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital., 65, 1013
  12. Hosono, 2017, PASJ, 69, 26, 10.1093/pasj/psw131 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hubbard, 1980, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 225, 10.1029/JB085iB01p00225 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Inamdar, 2016, ApJ, 817, L13, 10.3847/2041-8205/817/2/L13 · DOI
  15. Kegerreis, 2018, ApJ, 861, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac725 · DOI
  16. Kurosaki, 2019, AJ, 157, 13, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf165 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaf165
  17. Lecoanet, 2016, MNRAS, 455, 4274, 10.1093/mnras/stv2564 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2564
  18. Leopardi, 2007, PhD thesis
  19. Lombardi, 1999, J. Comput. Phys., 152, 687, 10.1006/jcph.1999.6256 · doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6256
  20. Melosh, 2007, Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 42, 2079, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb01009.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Monaghan, 1992, ARA&A, 30, 543, 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Monaghan, 2012, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 44, 323, 10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101220 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Morris, 1996, Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust., 13, 97, 10.1017/S1323358000020610 · doi:10.1017/s1323358000020610
  24. Price, 2012, J. Comput. Phys., 231, 759, 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.011 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Raskin, 2016, ApJ, 820, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/102 · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/102
  26. Reinhardt, 2017, MNRAS, 467, 4252, 10.1093/mnras/stx322 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Saff, 1997, Math. Intell., 19, 5, 10.1007/BF03024331 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Schaller, 2016, Proc. PASC 16 Conf., 2:1
  29. Slattery, 1992, Icarus, 99, 167, 10.1016/0019-1035(92)90180-F · DOI
  30. Springel, 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1105, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Springel, 2010, ARA&A, 48, 391, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130914 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Wallace, 1960, J. Appl. Phys., 31, 168, 10.1063/1.1735393 · DOI
  33. Wang, 2007, MNRAS, 380, 93, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12053.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. Waples, 2004, Nat. Resour. Res., 13, 97, 10.1023/B:NARR.0000032647.41046.e7 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Willis, 2018, Adv. Parallel Comp., 32, 507
  36. Woolfson, 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1173, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11498.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11498.x

Cited by

See all 50

Metadata

Authors
Kegerreis, J. A., Eke, V. R., Gonnet, P., Korycansky, D. G., Massey, R. J., Schaller, M., & Teodoro, L. F. A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2019-06-10
Volume
487
Issue
4
Pages
5029-5040
ISSN
  • 0035-8711
  • 1365-2966
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/K00042X/1, ST/P002293/1, ST/R002371/1, ST/S002502/1, ST/R000832/1, ST/N50404X/1, ST/P000541/1)
  • Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
  • Durham University
  • Royal Society
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX13AK99G)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Planetary giant impacts: convergence of high-resolution simulations using efficient spherical initial conditions and swift. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stz1606
The paper
Kegerreis, J. A., Eke, V. R., Gonnet, P., Korycansky, D. G., Massey, R. J., Schaller, M., & Teodoro, L. F. A. (2019). Planetary giant impacts: convergence of high-resolution simulations using efficient spherical initial conditions and swift. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1606

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.