The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Planetary giant impacts: convergence of high-resolution simulations using efficient spherical initial conditions and swift
Abstract
We perform simulations of giant impacts on to the young Uranus using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with over 100 million particles. This 100–1000 × improvement in particle number reveals that simulations with below 107 particles fail to converge on even bulk properties such as the post-impact rotation period, or on the detailed erosion of the atmosphere. Higher resolutions appear to determine these large-scale results reliably, but even 108 particles may not be sufficient to study the detailed composition of the debris – finding that almost an order of magnitude more rock is ejected beyond the Roche radius than with 105 particles. We present two software developments that enable this increase in the feasible number of particles. First, we present an algorithm to place any number of particles in a spherical shell such that they all have an SPH density within 1 per cent of the desired value. Particles in model planets built from these nested shells have a root-mean-squared velocity below 1 per cent of the escape speed, which avoids the need for long precursor simulations to produce relaxed initial conditions. Secondly, we develop the hydrodynamics code sph with interdependent fine-grained tasking(swift) for planetary simulations. swift uses task-based parallelism and other modern algorithmic approaches to take full advantage of contemporary supercomputer architectures. Both the particle placement code and swift are publicly released.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most previous Moon-formation simulations have used around 10 5 -10 6 particles, but these resolutions can fail to converge on even largescale outcomes of giant impacts, such as the planet's rotation period or the mass of ejected debris (Genda et al. 2015;Hosono et al. 2017;Kegerreis et al. 2019).”
From Immediate Origin of the Moon as a Post-impact Satellite (2022) · cites this paper as Kegerreis et al. 2019
In the citing paper
“The sets described above all use ∼10 7 SPH particles, compared with the 10 5 -10 6 typically used in the current literature, which can be insufficient to resolve or converge on both small-and large-scale outcomes of giant impacts (Genda et al. 2015;Hosono et al. 2017;Kegerreis et al. 2019).”
From Immediate Origin of the Moon as a Post-impact Satellite (2022) · cites this paper as Kegerreis et al. 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Balsara, 1995, J. Comput. Phys., 121, 357, 10.1016/S0021-9991(95)90221-X · DOI · Paper page
- Benz, 1986, Icarus, 66, 515, 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90088-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Borrow, 2018, Proc. of 13th SPHERIC International Workshop, 44
- Ćuk, 2012, Science, 338, 1047, 10.1126/science.1225542 · DOI · Paper page
- Cullen, 2010, MNRAS, 408, 669, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17158.x · DOI · Paper page
- Dehnen, 2012, MNRAS, 425, 1068, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21439.x · DOI · Paper page
- Deng, 2019, ApJ, 870, 127, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf399 · DOI · Paper page
- Diehl, 2015, Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust., 32, e048, 10.1017/pasa.2015.50 · doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.50
- Genda, 2015, Icarus, 262, 58, 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.029 · DOI · Paper page
- Gonnet, 2015, SIAM J Sci. Comput., 37, C95, 10.1137/140964266 · doi:10.1137/140964266
- Herant, 1994, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital., 65, 1013
- Hosono, 2017, PASJ, 69, 26, 10.1093/pasj/psw131 · DOI · Paper page
- Hubbard, 1980, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 225, 10.1029/JB085iB01p00225 · DOI · Paper page
- Inamdar, 2016, ApJ, 817, L13, 10.3847/2041-8205/817/2/L13 · DOI
- Kegerreis, 2018, ApJ, 861, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac725 · DOI
- Kurosaki, 2019, AJ, 157, 13, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf165 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaf165
- Lecoanet, 2016, MNRAS, 455, 4274, 10.1093/mnras/stv2564 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2564
- Leopardi, 2007, PhD thesis
- Lombardi, 1999, J. Comput. Phys., 152, 687, 10.1006/jcph.1999.6256 · doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6256
- Melosh, 2007, Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 42, 2079, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb01009.x · DOI · Paper page
- Monaghan, 1992, ARA&A, 30, 543, 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551 · DOI · Paper page
- Monaghan, 2012, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 44, 323, 10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101220 · DOI · Paper page
- Morris, 1996, Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust., 13, 97, 10.1017/S1323358000020610 · doi:10.1017/s1323358000020610
- Price, 2012, J. Comput. Phys., 231, 759, 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.011 · DOI · Paper page
- Raskin, 2016, ApJ, 820, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/102 · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/102
- Reinhardt, 2017, MNRAS, 467, 4252, 10.1093/mnras/stx322 · DOI · Paper page
- Saff, 1997, Math. Intell., 19, 5, 10.1007/BF03024331 · DOI · Paper page
- Schaller, 2016, Proc. PASC 16 Conf., 2:1
- Slattery, 1992, Icarus, 99, 167, 10.1016/0019-1035(92)90180-F · DOI
- Springel, 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1105, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · DOI · Paper page
- Springel, 2010, ARA&A, 48, 391, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130914 · DOI · Paper page
- Wallace, 1960, J. Appl. Phys., 31, 168, 10.1063/1.1735393 · DOI
- Wang, 2007, MNRAS, 380, 93, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12053.x · DOI · Paper page
- Waples, 2004, Nat. Resour. Res., 13, 97, 10.1023/B:NARR.0000032647.41046.e7 · DOI · Paper page
- Willis, 2018, Adv. Parallel Comp., 32, 507
- Woolfson, 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1173, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11498.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11498.x
Cited by
Immediate Origin of the Moon as a Post-impact Satellite
Kegerreis, J. A., Ruiz-Bonilla, S., Eke, V. R., Massey, R. J., Sandnes, T. D., & Teodoro, L. F. A. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac8d96 · Cited by 50
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kegerreis, J. A., Eke, V. R., Gonnet, P., Korycansky, D. G., Massey, R. J., Schaller, M., & Teodoro, L. F. A.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-06-10
- Volume
- 487
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 5029-5040
- ISSN
- 0035-8711
- 1365-2966
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/K00042X/1, ST/P002293/1, ST/R002371/1, ST/S002502/1, ST/R000832/1, ST/N50404X/1, ST/P000541/1)
- Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
- Durham University
- Royal Society
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX13AK99G)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Planetary giant impacts: convergence of high-resolution simulations using efficient spherical initial conditions and swift. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stz1606
- The paper
- Kegerreis, J. A., Eke, V. R., Gonnet, P., Korycansky, D. G., Massey, R. J., Schaller, M., & Teodoro, L. F. A. (2019). Planetary giant impacts: convergence of high-resolution simulations using efficient spherical initial conditions and swift. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1606
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.