The role of GC-biased gene conversion in shaping the fastest evolving regions of the human genome
Open accessAbstract
GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) is a recombination-associated evolutionary process that accelerates the fixation of guanine or cytosine alleles, regardless of their effects on fitness. gBGC can increase the overall rate of substitutions, a hallmark of positive selection. Many fast-evolving genes and noncoding sequences in the human genome have GC-biased substitution patterns, suggesting that gBGC-in contrast to adaptive processes-may have driven the human changes in these sequences. To investigate this hypothesis, we developed a substitution model for DNA sequence evolution that quantifies the nonlinear interacting effects of selection and gBGC on substitution rates and patterns. Based on this model, we used a series of lineage-specific likelihood ratio tests to evaluate sequence alignments for evidence of changes in mode of selection, action of gBGC, or both. With a false positive rate of less than 5% for individual tests, we found that the majority (76%) of previously identified human accelerated regions are best explained without gBGC, whereas a substantial minority (19%) are best explained by the action of gBGC alone. Further, more than half (55%) have substitution rates that significantly exceed local estimates of the neutral rate, suggesting that these regions may have been shaped by positive selection rather than by relaxation of constraint. By distinguishing the effects of gBGC, relaxation of constraint, and positive selection we provide an integrated analysis of the evolutionary forces that shaped the fastest evolving regions of the human genome, which facilitates the design of targeted functional studies of adaptation in humans.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kostka et al. found that most HARs (76%), including HAR202, underwent an acceleration process better explained by either positive selection or relaxation of constraint rather than by gBGC.
“By using this method, they found that most HARs (76%), including HAR202, underwent an acceleration process better explained by either positive selection or relaxation of constraint (Kostka et al. 2012), rather than by gBGC”
From The Human Accelerated Region HAR202 Controls <i>NPAS3</i> Expression in the Developing Forebrain Displaying Differential Enhancer Activity Between Modern and Archaic Human Sequences (2024) · cites this paper as Kostka et al. 2012
The Results section, “gBGC Accounts for the Substitutions in Only a Minority of HARs,” says that 76% of HARs are best explained by a change in selection coefficient without gBGC, and divides them into positive-selection and relaxation-of-constraint classes. The passages do not identify HAR202 as belonging to either class, so the specific claim about HAR202 is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredgBGC was a mechanism found in only 19% of HARs.
“the latter being a mechanism only found in 19% of HARs (Kostka et al. 2012).”
From The Human Accelerated Region HAR202 Controls <i>NPAS3</i> Expression in the Developing Forebrain Displaying Differential Enhancer Activity Between Modern and Archaic Human Sequences (2024) · cites this paper as Kostka et al. 2012
GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) is one of the factors that can increase local substitution rates across the genome and is often a confounding factor for the detection of adaptive evolution.
“GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) is one of the factors that can increase local substitution rates across the genome and is often a confounding factor for the detection of adaptive evolution (Duret and Galtier 2009; Kostka et al. 2012; Capra et al. 2013).”
From Bayesian Detection of Convergent Rate Changes of Conserved Noncoding Elements on Phylogenetic Trees (2019) · cites this paper as Kostka et al. 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162 · see citing works
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05874 · Cited by 5,223 · see citing works
Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies
Pollard, K. S., Hubisz, M. J., Rosenbloom, K. R., & Siepel, A. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.097857.109 · Cited by 2,353 · see citing works
Self-citationA high-resolution recombination map of the human genome
Kong, A., Gudbjartsson, D. F., Sainz, J., Jonsdottir, G. M., Gudjonsson, S. A., Richardsson, B., Sigurdardottir, S. L., Barnard, J., Hallbeck, B., Másson, G., et al. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng917 · Cited by 1,750 · see citing works
An RNA gene expressed during cortical development evolved rapidly in humans
Pollard, K. S., Salama, S. R., Lambert, N., Lambot, M.-A., Coppens, S., Pedersen, J. S., Katzman, S., King, B., Onodera, C., Siepel, A., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05113 · Cited by 1,005 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Population Genetics of dN/dS
Kryazhimskiy, S., & Plotkin, J. B. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304 · Cited by 962 · see citing works
Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes
Duret, L., & Galtier, N. (2009) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-150001 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Inferring Nonneutral Evolution from Human-Chimp-Mouse Orthologous Gene Trios
Clark, A. G., Glanowski, S., Nielsen, R., Thomas, P. D., Kejariwal, A., Todd, M. A., Tanenbaum, D. M., Civello, D., Lu, F., Murphy, B., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088821 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Heyer, N. J., BITTNERJR, A., Echeverria, D., & WOODS, J. (2006) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.11.011 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Fine-scale recombination rate differences between sexes, populations and individuals
Kong, A., Þorleifsson, G., Gudbjartsson, D. F., Másson, G., Sigurðsson, Á., Jónasdóttir, Á., Walters, G. B., Jónasdóttir, A., Gylfason, A., Kristinsson, K. T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09525 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Patterns of Positive Selection in Six Mammalian Genomes
Kosiol, C., Vinař, T., da Fonseca, R. R., Hubisz, M. J., Bustamante, C. D., Nielsen, R., & Siepel, A. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000144 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Self-citationForces shaping the fastest evolving regions in the human genome
Pollard, K. S., Salama, S. R., King, B., Kern, A. D., Dreszer, T., Katzman, S., Siepel, A., Pedersen, J. S., Bejerano, G., Baertsch, R., et al. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020168 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Self-citationPHAST and RPHAST: phylogenetic analysis with space/time models
Hubisz, M. J., Pollard, K. S., & Siepel, A. (2011) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbq072 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Self-citationAccelerated Evolution of Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Humans
Prabhakar, S., Noonan, J. P., Pääbo, S., & Rubin, E. M. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1130738 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Human-Specific Gain of Function in a Developmental Enhancer
Prabhakar, S., Visel, A., Akiyama, J. A., Shoukry, M. I., Lewis, K. D., Holt, A., Plajzer-Frick, I., Morrison, H., FitzPatrick, D. R., Afzal, V., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159974 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
The Impact of Recombination on Nucleotide Substitutions in the Human Genome
Duret, L., & Arndt, P. F. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000071 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Recombination Drives the Evolution of GC-Content in the Human Genome
Meunier, J., & Duret, L. (2004) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msh070 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Models of Molecular Evolution and Phylogeny: Table 1.Preprint
Liò, P., & Goldman, N. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.12.1233 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Adaptation or biased gene conversion? Extending the null hypothesis of molecular evolution
Galtier, N., & Duret, L. (2007) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.03.011 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Romiguier, J., Ranwez, V., Douzery, E., & Galtier, N. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.104372.109 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Briggs, S. D., & Strahl, B. D. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0302-241 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Evolution of a finite population under gene conversion.
Nagylaki, T. (1983) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.80.20.6278 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Fast-evolving noncoding sequences in the human genome
Bird, C., Stranger, B. E., Liu, M., Thomas, D. J., Ingle, C., Beazley, C., Miller, W., Hurles, M. E., & Dermitzakis, E. T. (2007) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r118 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
GC-biased gene conversion promotes the fixation of deleterious amino acid changes in primates
Galtier, N., Duret, L., Glémin, S., & Ranwez, V. (2008) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2008.10.011 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Nielsen, R. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg147 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Hotspots of Biased Nucleotide Substitutions in Human Genes
Berglund, J., Pollard, K. S., & Webster, M. T. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000026 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citationDetecting positive selection within genomes: the problem of biased gene conversion
Ratnakumar, A., Mousset, S., Glémin, S., Berglund, J., Galtier, N., Duret, L., & Webster, M. T. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0007 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
An analysis of codon usage in mammals: Selection or mutation bias?
Eyre‐Walker, A. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02103136 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
McVean, G., & Vieira, J. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.1.245 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Dreszer, T. R., Wall, G. D., Haussler, D., & Pollard, K. S. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6395807 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationAdaptive Evolution of Conserved Noncoding Elements in Mammals
Kim, S. Y., & Pritchard, J. K. (2007) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030147 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Evolution of a large population under gene conversion.
Nagylaki, T. (1983) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.80.19.5941 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Harrison, R. J., & Charlesworth, B. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msq191 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
A maximum likelihood approach to the detection of selection from a phylogeny
Golding, B., & Felsenstein, J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02102078 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Local Recombination and Mutation Effects on Molecular Evolution in Drosophila
Takano‐Shimizu, T. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/153.3.1285 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
GENE CONVERSION: A HITHERTO OVERLOOKED PARAMETER IN POPULATION GENETICS
Gütz, H., & Leslie, J. F. (1976) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/83.4.861 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Substitution Patterns Are GC-Biased in Divergent Sequences across the Metazoans
Capra, J. A., & Pollard, K. S. (2011) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evr051 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationGC-Biased Evolution Near Human Accelerated Regions
Katzman, S. J., Kern, A. D., Pollard, K. S., Salama, S. R., & Haussler, D. H. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000960 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationComment on "Human-Specific Gain of Function in a Developmental Enhancer"
Duret, L., & Galtier, N. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165848 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Lawrie, D. S., Petrov, D. A., & Messer, P. W. (2011) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evr032 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Accelerated sequence divergence of conserved genomic elements inDrosophila melanogasterPreprint
Holloway, A. K., Begun, D. J., Siepel, A. C., & Pollard, K. S. (2008) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.077131.108 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationResponse to Comment on "Human-Specific Gain of Function in a Developmental Enhancer"
Prabhakar, S., Visel, A., Akiyama, J. A., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1166571 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The effect of constraint on the rate of evolution in neutral models with biased mutation.
Eyre‐Walker, A. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.1.233 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chromatin accessibility dynamics in a model of human forebrain development
Trevino, A. E., Sinnott-Armstrong, N., Andersen, J., Yoon, S.-J., Huber, N., Pritchard, J. K., Chang, H. Y., Greenleaf, W. J., & Pașca, S. P. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay1645 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Three-dimensional genome rewiring in loci with human accelerated regions
Keough, K. C., Whalen, S., Inoue, F., Przytycki, P. F., Fair, T., Deng, C., Steyert, M., Ryu, H., Lindblad-Toh, K., Karlsson, E., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm1696 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman evolution: the non-coding revolution
Franchini, L. F., & Pollard, K. S. (2017) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0428-9 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationBayesian Detection of Convergent Rate Changes of Conserved Noncoding Elements on Phylogenetic Trees
Hu, Z., Sackton, T. B., Edwards, S. V., & Liu, J. S. (2019) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz049 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Caporale, A. L., Cinalli, A. R., Rubinstein, M., & Franchini, L. F. (2024) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msae186 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“By using this method, they found that most HARs (76%), including HAR202, underwent an acceleration process better explained by either positive selection or relaxation of constraint (Kostka et al. 2012), rather than by gBGC, the latter being a mechanism only found in 19% of HARs (Kostka et al. 2012).”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Kostka, D., Hubisz, M. J., Siepel, A., & Pollard, K. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kostka, D.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1047-1057
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- PMC
- PMC3278478
- OpenAlex
- W2102029197
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM082901, #GM82901)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Keywords
- GC-biased gene conversion, human accelerated regions, positive selection, substitution rate, substitution patterns, recombination, substitution models, human genome evolution, non-coding sequences
- MeSH terms
- Base Composition, Base Sequence, Gene Conversion, Humans, Models, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Genome, Human, Likelihood Functions, Sequence Alignment, Evolution, Molecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review