Cited by 90Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Human evolution: the non-coding revolution

Open access
Franchini, Lucía F., Pollard, Katherine S.·2017·BMC Biology

Abstract

What made us human? Gene expression changes clearly played a significant part in human evolution, but pinpointing the causal regulatory mutations is hard. Comparative genomics enabled the identification of human accelerated regions (HARs) and other human-specific genome sequences. The major challenge in the past decade has been to link diverged sequences to uniquely human biology. This review discusses approaches to this problem, progress made at the molecular level, and prospects for moving towards genetic causes for uniquely human biology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12915-017-0428-9

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Nuttall Blood immunity and blood relationships 1904 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franchini, L. F., & Pollard, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Gladstone Institutes (US)
Corresponding author
Pollard, Katherine S.
Venue
BMC Biology
Published
2017-10-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
89-89
ISSN
1741-7007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2758033077
Cited by
90
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Gladstone Institutes
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
human evolution, non-coding DNA, gene expression regulation, human accelerated regions, regulatory mutations, comparative genomics, molecular evolution
MeSH terms
Humans, Genome, Human, Evolution, Molecular, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review