The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PCR bias in amplification of androgen receptor alleles, a trinucleotide repeat marker used in clonality studies
Open accessAbstract
Trinucleotide CAG repeats in the X-linked human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA) have proved a useful means of determining X chromosome haplotypes, and when combined with methylation analysis of nearby cytosine residues permits identification of non-random X inactivation in tumors of women. Co-amplification of two alleles in a heterozygote generates PCR products which differ in the number of CAG units, and thus their melting and secondary structure characteristics. We have shown that under optimal conditions amplification efficiency of two HUMARA alleles is near-equivalent, generating PCR products in a ratio proportional to that of the genomic template. In contrast, reduction of template quantity, damage of template by ultraviolet irradiation or addition of monovalent salts (sodium chloride, sodium acetate or ammonium acetate) produces highly variable imbalances of allelic PCR products, with a strong tendency to preferentially amplify lower molecular weight alleles. Variability and biasing was diminished by substitution of 7-deaza-2'-dGTP for dGTP during amplification, an intervention which reduces stability of intramolecular and intermolecular GC base pairing. We conclude that DNA which is scanty, damaged or salt contaminated may display amplification bias of GC-rich PCR targets, potentially confounding accurate interpretation or reproducibility of assays which require co-amplification of alleles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR
Polz, M. F., & Cavanaugh, C. M. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.10.3724-3730.1998 · Cited by 1,484
Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing
Dohm, J. C., Lottaz, C., Borodina, T., & Himmelbauer, H. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn425 · Cited by 1,088
Multiplex PCR: Optimization and Application in Diagnostic Virology
Elnifro, E. M., Ashshi, A. M., Cooper, R. J., & Klapper, P. E. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.4.559-570.2000 · Cited by 964
Mayr, D., Amann, G., Siefert, C., Diebold, J., & Anderegg, B. (2003) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.02-0562fje · Cited by 41
Molecular analysis of clonality in ovarian endometrial cysts
Yano, T., Jimbo, H., Yoshikawa, H., Tsutsumi, O., & Taketani, Y. (1999) · Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · doi:10.1159/000052858 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Multer, G. L., & Boynton, K. A.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1411-1418
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2168744717
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PCR bias in amplification of androgen receptor alleles, a trinucleotide repeat marker used in clonality studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/23.8.1411
- The paper
- Multer, G. L., & Boynton, K. A. (1995). PCR bias in amplification of androgen receptor alleles, a trinucleotide repeat marker used in clonality studies. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.8.1411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.