Cited by 1,484Molecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR

Open access
Polz, Martin F., Cavanaugh, Colleen M.·1998·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Bias introduced by the simultaneous amplification of specific genes from complex mixtures of templates remains poorly understood. To explore potential causes and the extent of bias in PCR amplification of 16S ribosomal DNAs (rDNAs), genomic DNAs of two closely and one distantly related bacterial species were mixed and amplified with universal, degenerate primers. Quantification and comparison of template and product ratios showed that there was considerable and reproducible overamplification of specific templates. Variability between replicates also contributed to the observed bias but in a comparatively minor way. Based on these initial observations, template dosage and differences in binding energies of permutations of the degenerate, universal primers were tested as two likely causes of this template-specific bias by using 16S rDNA templates modified by site-directed mutagenesis. When mixtures of mutagenized templates containing AT- and GC-rich priming sites were used, templates containing the GC-rich permutation amplified with higher efficiency, indicating that different primer binding energies may to a large extent be responsible for overamplification. In contrast, gene copy number was found to be an unlikely cause of the observed bias. Similarly, amplification from DNA extracted from a natural community to which different amounts of genomic DNA of a single bacterial species were added did not affect relative product ratios. Bias was reduced considerably by using high template concentrations, by performing fewer cycles, and by mixing replicate reaction preparations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.64.10.3724-3730.1998

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polz, M. F., & Cavanaugh, C. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
1998-10
Volume
64
Issue
10
Pages
3724-3730
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2162578061
Cited by
1,484
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 90
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
PCR bias, 16S rRNA gene, degenerate primers, gene copy number, site-directed mutagenesis, PCR cycle number, template concentration
MeSH terms
Bacillus subtilis, Base Sequence, DNA, Ribosomal, Escherichia coli, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Templates, Genetic, Vibrio, Reproducibility of Results, Oligonucleotide Probes, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Mutagenesis, Sequence Alignment, DNA Primers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review