Cited by 41Endometriosis Research and TreatmentOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentPlant and fungal interactions

Does endometriosis really have premalignant potential? A clonal analysis of laser-microdissected tissue

Mayr, Doris, Amann, Gudrun, Siefert, Christina, Diebold, Joachim, Anderegg, Birgit·2003·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Since 1925, epidemiological and histological evidence for an association between endometriosis and ovarian neoplasia has accumulated. Recently, publications assaying the clonality of a given cell population have implied endometriosis has premalignant properties. However, the human androgen receptor used as a marker in these studies is of highly questionable reliability due to the instability of its methylation pattern in nonmalignant cells and during the course of malignancy. Therefore, we decided to readdress the question of clonality of endometriotic foci by using an alternative assay based on a polymorphism of the phosphoglycerate kinase-1 gene. We overcame the limitation to using ovarian cysts (a problem encountered in other studies) by laser-microdissecting defined tissue fractions of interest. From the 13/29 informative patients, a total of 32 endometriotic samples from various sites was assayed. Only 2/32 samples from different patients bore monoclonal tissue. With one of those cases, we present the first direct evidence of the two morphological endometric compartments comprising a single biphasic developmental unit. Neither monoclonal patient was characterized by any outstanding clinical parameters, including neoplasia. Individual endometriotic foci from the only patient in this study with neoplasia was assayed as being polyclonal. Therefore, former studies stating endometriosis as premalignant have to be cautiously reinterpreted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.02-0562fje

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endometriosis lesions are clonal, as demonstrated for typical, deep, and cystic ovarian endometriosis.

    “Endometriosis lesions are clonal, as demonstrated for typical (149), deep (150), and cystic ovarian (151-153) endometriosis.”

    From Pathogenesis of endometriosis: The genetic/epigenetic theory (2019) · cites this paper as [150]

  • Deep and cystic ovarian endometriosis are consistently found to be clonal in origin.

    “A strong argument is that deep (174, 175) and cystic (176-178) ovarian endometriosis are consistently found to be clonal in origin.”

    From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [174]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayr, D., Amann, G., Siefert, C., Diebold, J., & Anderegg, B.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-19
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
693-695
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2116497451
Cited by
41
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and fungal interactions
Keywords
endometriosis, ovarian neoplasms, clonality, laser microdissection, human androgen receptor, DNA methylation, monoclonality, polyclonality
MeSH terms
Clone Cells, Dissection, DNA, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Lasers, Ovarian Neoplasms, Phosphoglycerate Kinase, Precancerous Conditions, Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review