The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MGnify: the microbiome sequence data analysis resource in 2023
Open accessAbstract
The MGnify platform (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metagenomics) facilitates the assembly, analysis and archiving of microbiome-derived nucleic acid sequences. The platform provides access to taxonomic assignments and functional annotations for nearly half a million analyses covering metabarcoding, metatranscriptomic, and metagenomic datasets, which are derived from a wide range of different environments. Over the past 3 years, MGnify has not only grown in terms of the number of datasets contained but also increased the breadth of analyses provided, such as the analysis of long-read sequences. The MGnify protein database now exceeds 2.4 billion non-redundant sequences predicted from metagenomic assemblies. This collection is now organised into a relational database making it possible to understand the genomic context of the protein through navigation back to the source assembly and sample metadata, marking a major improvement. To extend beyond the functional annotations already provided in MGnify, we have applied deep learning-based annotation methods. The technology underlying MGnify's Application Programming Interface (API) and website has been upgraded, and we have enabled the ability to perform downstream analysis of the MGnify data through the introduction of a coupled Jupyter Lab environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge
The UniProt Consortium (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1049 · Cited by 7,698
Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment
Tyson, G. W., Chapman, J., Hugenholtz, P., Allen, E. E., Ram, R. J., Richardson, P. M., Solovyev, V. V., Rubin, E. M., Rokhsar, D. S., & Banfield, J. F. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02340 · Cited by 2,417
A unified catalog of 204,938 reference genomes from the human gut microbiome
Almeida, A., Nayfach, S., Boland, M., Strozzi, F., Beracochea, M., Shi, Z. J., Pollard, K. S., Sakharova, E., Parks, D. H., Hugenholtz, P., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0603-3 · Cited by 1,367
Self-citationClustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time
Steinegger, M., & Söding, J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · Cited by 875
MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020
Mitchell, A. L., Almeida, A., Beracochea, M., Boland, M., Burgin, J., Cochrane, G., Crusoe, M. R., Kale, V., Potter, S. C., Richardson, L. J., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1035 · Cited by 562
Self-citationUsing deep learning to annotate the protein universe
Bileschi, M. L., Belanger, D., Bryant, D. H., Sanderson, T., Carter, B., Sculley, D., Bateman, A., DePristo, M. A., & Colwell, L. J. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01179-w · Cited by 332 · cited 2×
“, (24)), which uses convolutional neural networks to annotate each protein residue in the database with a Pfam family (or clan) label that is then converted into domain calls.”
BackgroundSelf-citationWirbel, J., Zych, K., Essex, M., Karcher, N., Kartal, E., Salazar, G., Bork, P., Sunagawa, S., & Zeller, G. (2021) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02306-1 · Cited by 269
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Lobanov, 2022, Ecosystem-specific microbiota and microbiome databases in the era of big data, Environ. Microbiome., 17, 37, 10.1186/s40793-022-00433-1 · DOI
- Crusoe, 2022, Methods included: standardizing computational reuse and portability with the common workflow language, Commun. ACM, 65, 54, 10.1145/3486897 · DOI
- Goble, 2021, Implementing FAIR Digital Objects in the EOSC-Life Workflow Collaboratory, Zenodo
- Nielsen, 2014, Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes, Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 822, 10.1038/nbt.2939 · DOI · Paper page
- Parks, 2017, Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life, Nat. Microbiol., 2, 1533, 10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Nayfach, 2019, New insights from uncultivated genomes of the global human gut microbiome, Nature, 568, 505, 10.1038/s41586-019-1058-x · DOI · Paper page
- Kanehisa, 2016, KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation, Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D457, 10.1093/nar/gkv1070 · DOI · Paper page
- Richardson, 2019, Genome properties in 2019: a new companion database to interpro for the inference of complete functional attributes, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, D564, 10.1093/nar/gky1013 · DOI · Paper page
- Blin, 2017, antiSMASH 4.0—improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification, Nucleic Acids Res., 45, W36, 10.1093/nar/gkx319 · DOI · Paper page
- Nassar, 2022, A machine learning framework for discovery and enrichment of metagenomics metadata from open access publications, GigaScience, 11, giac077, 10.1093/gigascience/giac077 · DOI · Paper page
- Eiamthong, 2022, Discovery and genetic code expansion of a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) hydrolase from the human saliva metagenome for the degradation and bio-functionalization of PET, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl., 61, e202203061, 10.1002/anie.202203061 · DOI
- Inoue, 2022, Biome-specific distribution of Ni-containing carbon monoxide dehydrogenases, Extremophiles, 26, 9, 10.1007/s00792-022-01259-y · DOI
- Kazlauskas, 2020, Diversity and evolution of B-family DNA polymerases, Nucleic Acids Res., 48, 10142, 10.1093/nar/gkaa760 · DOI
- Hyatt, 2010, Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification, BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 119, 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 · DOI · Paper page
- Rho, 2010, FragGeneScan: predicting genes in short and error-prone reads, Nucleic Acids Res., 38, e191, 10.1093/nar/gkq747 · DOI
- Boeckmann, 2003, The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 365, 10.1093/nar/gkg095 · DOI
- Mistry, 2021, Pfam: the protein families database in 2021, Nucleic Acids Res., 49, D412, 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
- Tarkowska, 2018, Eleven quick tips to build a usable REST API for life sciences, PLoS Comput. Biol., 14, e1006542, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006542 · DOI
- Bingmann, 2019, COBS: a compact bit-sliced signature index, 285, 10.1007/978-3-030-32686-9_21 · DOI
- Titus Brown, 2016, sourmash: a library for minhash sketching of DNA, J. Open Source Softw., 1, 27, 10.21105/joss.00027 · DOI · Paper page
- McMurdie, 2013, phyloseq: an r package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data, PLoS One, 8, e61217, 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model
Hayes, T., Rao, R., Akin, H., Sofroniew, N. J., Oktay, D., Lin, Z., Verkuil, R., Tran, V. Q., Deaton, J., Wiggert, M., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ads0018 · Cited by 937
Harrison, P. W., Amode, M. R., Austine-Orimoloye, O., Azov, A. G., Barba, M., Barnes, I., Becker, A., Bennett, R., Berry, A., Bhai, J., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1049 · Cited by 742
Self-citationHigh-throughput prediction of protein conformational distributions with subsampled AlphaFold2
Monteiro da Silva, G., Cui, J. Y., Dalgarno, D. C., Lisi, G. P., & Rubenstein, B. M. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46715-9 · Cited by 196
Genomic language model predicts protein co-regulation and function
Hwang, Y., Cornman, A. L., Kellogg, E. H., Ovchinnikov, S., & Girguis, P. R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46947-9 · Cited by 99
“The genomic corpus was generated using the MGnify 27 dataset (released 2022-05-06 and downloaded 2022-06-07).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, L., Allen, B., Baldi, G., Beracochea, M., Bileschi, M. L., Burdett, T., Burgin, J., Caballero-Pérez, J., Cochrane, G., Colwell, L. J., Curtis, T., Escobar-Zepeda, A., Gurbich, T. A., Kale, V., Korobeynikov, A., Raj, S., Rogers, A. B., Sakharova, E., Sanchez, S., Wilkinson, D. J., & Finn, R. D.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-12-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D753-D759
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W4310957810
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 21.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Funders
- European Union's Horizon 2020
- Research and Innovation programme (817729, 862923)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N018354/1, BB/R015228/1, BB/T000902/1, BB/V01868X/1)
- ELIXIR
- Russian Science Foundation (19-14-00172)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory
- UK Research and Innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
