Cited by 631vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

The immune epitope database 2.0

Open access
Vita, Randi, Zarebski, Laura, Greenbaum, Jason A., Emami, Hussein, Hoof, Ilka, Salimi, Nima, Damle, Rohini, Sette, Alessandro +1 more·2010·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB, www.iedb.org) provides a catalog of experimentally characterized B and T cell epitopes, as well as data on Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) binding and MHC ligand elution experiments. The database represents the molecular structures recognized by adaptive immune receptors and the experimental contexts in which these molecules were determined to be immune epitopes. Epitopes recognized in humans, nonhuman primates, rodents, pigs, cats and all other tested species are included. Both positive and negative experimental results are captured. Over the course of 4 years, the data from 180,978 experiments were curated manually from the literature, which covers approximately 99% of all publicly available information on peptide epitopes mapped in infectious agents (excluding HIV) and 93% of those mapped in allergens. In addition, data that would otherwise be unavailable to the public from 129,186 experiments were submitted directly by investigators. The curation of epitopes related to autoimmunity is expected to be completed by the end of 2010. The database can be queried by epitope structure, source organism, MHC restriction, assay type or host organism, among other criteria. The database structure, as well as its querying, browsing and reporting interfaces, was completely redesigned for the IEDB 2.0 release, which became publicly available in early 2009.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkp1004

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increasing number of structural, sequence and experimental data on antibodies being deposited in the public domain provides the necessary foundation for improving data-driven methods.

    “The increasing number of structural [16], sequence [17] and experimental data [18–21] on antibodies being deposited in the public domain provides the necessary foundation for improving such data-driven methods.”
  • Other resources such as the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) link structural information to experimentally derived epitope data.

    “Other resources such as the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) [18] link structural information to experimentally derived epitope data.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]Greenbaum JA Vita R Zarebski L Emami H Sette A Ruttenberg A Peters B Representing the Immune Epitope Database in OWL Proceedings of the 12th Annual Bio-Ontologies Meeting. International Society for Computational Biology 2009 45 48
  2. [19]The OBI Consortium Modeling biomedical experimental processes with OBI Proceedings of the 12th Annual Bio-Ontologies 35 Meeting. International Society for Computational Biology 2009 41 44

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vita, R., Zarebski, L., Greenbaum, J. A., Emami, H., Hoof, I., Salimi, N., Damle, R., Sette, A., & Peters, B.
Affiliations
La Jolla Institute for Immunology (US)
Corresponding author
Vita, Randi
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2009-11-10
Volume
38
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
D854-D862
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2028339001
Cited by
631
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 59
FWCI
20.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSN2662004000 0 6C)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
IEDB, B-cell epitopes, T cell epitopes, MHC binding, peptide epitopes, infectious agents, allergens, autoimmunity, database curation, database redesign
MeSH terms
Animals, Epitopes, Communicable Diseases, Humans, Immune System, Immunogenetics, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Peptides, Proteins, Software, Information Storage and Retrieval, Computational Biology, Internet, Databases, Genetic, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review