Cited by 305vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchProtein Structure and Dynamics

Structural analysis of B-cell epitopes in antibody: protein complexes

Open access
Kringelum, Jens Vindahl, Nielsen, Morten, Padkjær, Søren Berg, Lund, Ole·2013·Molecular Immunology

Abstract

The binding of antigens to antibodies is one of the key events in an immune response against foreign molecules and is a critical element of several biomedical applications including vaccines and immunotherapeutics. For development of such applications, the identification of antibody binding sites (B-cell epitopes) is essential. However experimental epitope mapping is highly cost-intensive and computer-aided methods do in general have moderate performance. One major reason for this moderate performance is an incomplete understanding of what characterizes an epitope. To fill this gap, we here developed a novel framework for comparing and superimposing B-cell epitopes and applied it on a dataset of 107 non-similar antigen:antibody structures extracted from the PDB database. With the presented framework, we were able to describe the general B-cell epitope as a flat, oblong, oval shaped volume consisting of predominantly hydrophobic amino acids in the center flanked by charged residues. The average epitope was found to be made up of ∼15 residues with one linear stretch of 5 or more residues constituting more than half of the epitope size. Furthermore, the epitope area is predominantly constrained to a plane above the antibody tip, in which the epitope is orientated in a -30° to 60° angle relative to the light to heavy chain antibody direction. Contrary to previously findings, we did not find a significant deviation between the amino acid composition in epitopes and the composition of equally exposed parts of the antigen surface. Our results, in combination with previously findings, give a detailed picture of the B-cell epitope that may be used in development of improved B-cell prediction methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molimm.2012.06.001

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Arbitrary molecular surfaces appear to be indistinguishable from epitope regions, suggesting that predictions should be performed with reference to a particular antibody.

    “However, arbitrary molecular surfaces appear to be indistinguishable from epitope regions [167–169] suggesting that predictions should be performed with reference to a particular antibody [116, 118–120].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kringelum, J. V., Nielsen, M., Padkjær, S. B., & Lund, O.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
Corresponding author
Lund, Ole
Venue
Molecular Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
53
Issue
1-2
Pages
24-34
ISSN
0161-5890 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018470704
Cited by
305
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (HHSN26620040006C)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
B-cell epitopes, antibody-antigen binding, epitope prediction, antibody binding sites
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Antigen-Antibody Complex, Binding Sites, Antibody, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Epitope Mapping, Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte, Protein Structure, Quaternary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review