Cited by 102RNA Research and SplicingGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

SFmap: a web server for motif analysis and prediction of splicing factor binding sites

Open access
Paz, I., Akerman, M., Dror, I., Kosti, I., Mandel-Gutfreund, Y.·2010·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Alternative splicing (AS) is a post-transcriptional process considered to be responsible for the huge diversity of proteins in higher eukaryotes. AS events are regulated by different splicing factors (SFs) that bind to sequence elements on the RNA. SFmap is a web server for predicting putative SF binding sites in genomic data (http://sfmap.technion.ac.il). SFmap implements the COS(WR) algorithm, which computes similarity scores for a given regulatory motif based on information derived from its sequence environment and its evolutionary conservation. Input for SFmap is a human genomic sequence or a list of sequences in FASTA format that can either be uploaded from a file or pasted into a window. SFmap searches within a given sequence for significant hits of binding motifs that are either stored in our database or defined by the user. SFmap results are provided both as a text file and as a graphical web interface.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkq444

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paz, I., Akerman, M., Dror, I., Kosti, I., & Mandel-Gutfreund, Y.
Affiliations
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2010-05-25
Volume
38
Issue
Web Server
Pages
W281-W285
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W1988971922
Cited by
102
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
alternative splicing, evolutionary conservation, human genome sequence, web server
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Binding Sites, Humans, Software, User-Computer Interface, Genome, Human, RNA-Binding Proteins, Alternative Splicing, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review