Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The BRENDA Tissue Ontology (BTO): the first all-integrating ontology of all organisms for enzyme sources

Open access
Gremse, M., Chang, A., Schomburg, I., Grote, A., Scheer, M., Ebeling, C., Schomburg, D.·2011·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

BTO, the BRENDA Tissue Ontology (http://www.BTO.brenda-enzymes.org) represents a comprehensive structured encyclopedia of tissue terms. The project started in 2003 to create a connection between the enzyme data collection of the BRENDA enzyme database and a structured network of source tissues and cell types. Currently, BTO contains more than 4600 different anatomical structures, tissues, cell types and cell lines, classified under generic categories corresponding to the rules and formats of the Gene Ontology Consortium and organized as a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Most of the terms are endowed with comments on their derivation or definitions. The content of the ontology is constantly curated with ∼1000 new terms each year. Four different types of relationships between the terms are implemented. A versatile web interface with several search and navigation functionalities allows convenient online access to the BTO and to the enzymes isolated from the tissues. Important areas of applications of the BTO terms are the detection of enzymes in tissues and the provision of a solid basis for text-mining approaches in this field. It is widely used by lab scientists, curators of genomic and biochemical databases and bioinformaticians. The BTO is freely available at http://www.obofoundry.org.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkq968

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Ashburner, 2000, Nature genetics, 25, 25, 10.1038/75556 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2009, Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D588, 10.1093/nar/gkn820 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Schomburg, 2004, Nucleic Acids Research, 32, D431, 10.1093/nar/gkh081 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2010, Nucleic Acids Research, 38, D331, 10.1093/nar/gkp1018 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Smith, 2007, Nature biotechnology, 25, 1251, 10.1038/nbt1346 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2005, IN SILICO, 5, 61
  7. Kelso, 2003, Genome Research, 13, 1222, 10.1101/gr.985203 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Avraham, 2008, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, D449, 10.1093/nar/gkm908 · DOI
  9. 2010, Nucleic Acids Research, 38, D142, 10.1093/nar/gkp846 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 2010, Bioinformatics, 26, 1112, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq099 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Rosse, 2003, Journal of biomedical informatics, 36, 478, 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Portales-Casamar, 2007, Genome biology, 8, R207, 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r207 · DOI
  13. 2010, 125, 651, 10.1007/s00214-009-0670-5 · DOI
  14. Vizcaino, 2009, Proteomics, 9, 4276, 10.1002/pmic.200900402 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Mosca, 2010, 4, 76, 10.1186/1752-0509-4-76 · DOI

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Gremse, M., Chang, A., Schomburg, I., Grote, A., Scheer, M., Ebeling, C., & Schomburg, D.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2010-10-28
Volume
39
Issue
Database
Pages
D507-D513
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2128386749
Cited by
175
References
1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The BRENDA Tissue Ontology (BTO): the first all-integrating ontology of all organisms for enzyme sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkq968
The paper
Gremse, M., Chang, A., Schomburg, I., Grote, A., Scheer, M., Ebeling, C., & Schomburg, D. (2011). The BRENDA Tissue Ontology (BTO): the first all-integrating ontology of all organisms for enzyme sources. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq968

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.