Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 601

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases

Open access
Caspi, R., Altman, T., Dreher, K., Fulcher, C. A., Subhraveti, P., Keseler, I. M., Kothari, A., Krummenacker, M., Latendresse, M., Mueller, L. A., Ong, Q., Paley, S., Pujar, A., Shearer, A. G., Travers, M., Weerasinghe, D., Zhang, P., Karp, P. D.·2012·Nucleic Acids Research
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkr1014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The MetaCyc database (http://metacyc.org/) provides a comprehensive and freely accessible resource for metabolic pathways and enzymes from all domains of life. The pathways in MetaCyc are experimentally determined, small-molecule metabolic pathways and are curated from the primary scientific literature. MetaCyc contains more than 1800 pathways derived from more than 30,000 publications, and is the largest curated collection of metabolic pathways currently available. Most reactions in MetaCyc pathways are linked to one or more well-characterized enzymes, and both pathways and enzymes are annotated with reviews, evidence codes and literature citations. BioCyc (http://biocyc.org/) is a collection of more than 1700 organism-specific Pathway/Genome Databases (PGDBs). Each BioCyc PGDB contains the full genome and predicted metabolic network of one organism. The network, which is predicted by the Pathway Tools software using MetaCyc as a reference database, consists of metabolites, enzymes, reactions and metabolic pathways. BioCyc PGDBs contain additional features, including predicted operons, transport systems and pathway-hole fillers. The BioCyc website and Pathway Tools software offer many tools for querying and analysis of PGDBs, including Omics Viewers and comparative analysis. New developments include a zoomable web interface for diagrams; flux-balance analysis model generation from PGDBs; web services; and a new tool called Web Groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkr1014

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 2010, Nucleic Acids Research, 38, D473, 10.1093/nar/gkp875 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Dale, 2010, BMC bioinformatics [electronic resource], 11, 15, 10.1186/1471-2105-11-15 · DOI
  3. Karp, 2011, Archives of toxicology, 85, 1015, 10.1007/s00204-011-0705-2 · DOI
  4. Christie, 2004, Nucleic Acids Research, 32, D311, 10.1093/nar/gkh033 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Mueller, 2003, Plant Physiology, 132, 453, 10.1104/pp.102.017236 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2008, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, D947, 10.1093/nar/gkm968 · DOI
  7. Evsikov, 2009, Genome biology, 10, R84, 10.1186/gb-2009-10-8-r84 · DOI
  8. Seo, 2009, 3, 33, 10.1186/1752-0509-3-33 · DOI
  9. 2007, Bioinformatics, 23, 1418, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm040 · DOI
  10. 2010, Plant Physiology, 153, 1479, 10.1104/pp.110.157396 · DOI
  11. 2009, Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D515, 10.1093/nar/gkn844 · DOI
  12. Doyle, 2009, 3, 57, 10.1186/1752-0509-3-57 · DOI
  13. May, 2009, BMC genomics [electronic resource], 10, 209, 10.1186/1471-2164-10-209 · DOI
  14. 2011, Nucleic Acids Research, 39, D1149, 10.1093/nar/gkq866 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2007, Nucleic Acids Research, 35, D401, 10.1093/nar/gkl858 · DOI
  16. Cibis, 2011, Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1733, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.02.009 · DOI
  17. 2011, Journal of Infectious Diseases, 203, 1613, 10.1093/infdis/jir112 · DOI
  18. 2011, PNAS, 108, 13752, 10.1073/pnas.1102444108 · DOI
  19. Ruiz, 2011, 6, e18551, 10.1371/journal.pone.0018551 · DOI
  20. Giannone, 2011, 6, e22942, 10.1371/journal.pone.0022942 · DOI
  21. Banerjee, 2011, 6, e19280, 10.1371/journal.pone.0019280 · DOI
  22. 2011, mBio, 2, e00301
  23. 2011, Journal of Bacteriology, 193, 1317, 10.1128/JB.01184-10 · DOI
  24. Aggarwal, 2011, FEMS Microbiology Letters, 315, 115, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02179.x · DOI
  25. Holder, 2011, 7, e1002219, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002219 · DOI
  26. Baumann, 2011, BMC genomics [electronic resource], 12, 218, 10.1186/1471-2164-12-218 · DOI
  27. 2011, Genome Biology and Evolution, 3, 195, 10.1093/gbe/evr002 · DOI
  28. 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77, 5352, 10.1128/AEM.00097-11 · DOI
  29. Kim, 2011, 7, 460, 10.1038/msb.2010.115 · DOI
  30. Li, 2011, 6, e21804, 10.1371/journal.pone.0021804 · DOI
  31. Li, 2011, 12, 381, 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00681.x · DOI
  32. Jaenicke, 2011, 6, e14519, 10.1371/journal.pone.0014519 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Karp, 2002, Bioinformatics, 18, S225, 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.S225 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2009, Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D593, 10.1093/nar/gkn582 · DOI
  35. 2009, Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D5, 10.1093/nar/gkn741 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Latendresse, 2011, BMC bioinformatics [electronic resource], 12, 176, 10.1186/1471-2105-12-176 · DOI
  37. Tao, 1999, Journal of Bacteriology, 181, 6425, 10.1128/JB.181.20.6425-6440.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 2009, MATH PROGRAM COMPUT, 1, 1, 10.1007/s12532-008-0001-1 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 2004, Genome Research, 14, 917, 10.1101/gr.2050304 · DOI
  40. 2010, Database, 2010, baq006, 10.1093/database/baq006 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Caspi, R., Altman, T., Dreher, K., Fulcher, C. A., Subhraveti, P., Keseler, I. M., Kothari, A., Krummenacker, M., Latendresse, M., Mueller, L. A., Ong, Q., Paley, S., Pujar, A., Shearer, A. G., Travers, M., Weerasinghe, D., Zhang, P., & Karp, P. D.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2011-11-18
Volume
40
Issue
D1
Pages
D742-D753
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
DOI
10.1093/nar/gkr1014
OpenAlex
W4237293127
Cited by
601
References
2
FWCI
30.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 (vor, 2002 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.