Cited by 25Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene expression and cancer classificationBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Unveiling new disease, pathway, and gene associations via multi-scale neural network

Open access
Gaudelet, Thomas, Malod-Dognin, Noël, Sánchez-Valle, Jon, Pancaldi, Vera, Valencia, Alfonso, Pržulj, Nataša·2020·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Diseases involve complex modifications to the cellular machinery. The gene expression profile of the affected cells contains characteristic patterns linked to a disease. Hence, new biological knowledge about a disease can be extracted from these profiles, improving our ability to diagnose and assess disease risks. This knowledge can be used for drug re-purposing, or by physicians to evaluate a patient's condition and co-morbidity risk. Here, we consider differential gene expressions obtained by microarray technology for patients diagnosed with various diseases. Based on these data and cellular multi-scale organization, we aim at uncovering disease-disease, disease-gene and disease-pathway associations. We propose a neural network with structure based on the multi-scale organization of proteins in a cell into biological pathways. We show that this model is able to correctly predict the diagnosis for the majority of patients. Through the analysis of the trained model, we predict disease-disease, disease-pathway, and disease-gene associations and validate the predictions by comparisons to known interactions and literature search, proposing putative explanations for the predictions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0231059

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gaudelet et al. modeled a neural network structure on the multiscale functional organization of a cell by integrating gene-pathway annotations in the Reactome database, and their model accurately determined patient diagnoses based on gene expression data.

    “In a related study, Gaudelet et al. modeled a neural network structure on the multiscale functional organization of a cell by integrating gene-pathway annotations in the Reactome database; their model was able to accurately determine patient diagnoses based on gene expression data.”

    From Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems (2021) · cites this paper as Gaudelet et al., 2020

  • The trained Gaudelet neural network enabled extraction of biological knowledge by determining novel disease-pathway and disease-gene associations.

    “Importantly, the trained neural network enabled extraction of biological knowledge by determining novel disease-pathway and disease-gene associations (Gaudelet et al., 2020).”

    From Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems (2021) · cites this paper as Gaudelet et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaudelet, T., Malod-Dognin, N., Sánchez-Valle, J., Pancaldi, V., Valencia, A., & Pržulj, N.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Pržulj, Nataša
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2020-04-06
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
e0231059
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914372520
Cited by
25
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre
  • Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS (J1-8155, project J1-8155)
  • H2020 European Research Council (770827)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
gene-disease association, differential gene expression, microarray data, multi-scale neural network, biological pathways, diagnostic prediction, drug repurposing
MeSH terms
Disease, Humans, Models, Biological, Prognosis, ROC Curve, Signal Transduction, Comorbidity, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Gene Regulatory Networks, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review