The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation
Open accessAbstract
The Reference Sequence (RefSeq) project at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) provides annotation for over 95 000 prokaryotic genomes that meet standards for sequence quality, completeness, and freedom from contamination. Genomes are annotated by a single Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) to provide users with a resource that is as consistent and accurate as possible. Notable recent changes include the development of a hierarchical evidence scheme, a new focus on curating annotation evidence sources, the addition and curation of protein profile hidden Markov models (HMMs), release of an updated pipeline (PGAP-4), and comprehensive re-annotation of RefSeq prokaryotic genomes. Antimicrobial resistance proteins have been reannotated comprehensively, improved structural annotation of insertion sequence transposases and selenoproteins is provided, curated complex domain architectures have given upgraded names to millions of multidomain proteins, and we introduce a new kind of annotation rule-BlastRules. Continual curation of supporting evidence, and propagation of improved names onto RefSeq proteins ensures that the functional annotation of genomes is kept current. An increasing share of our annotation now derives from HMMs and other sets of annotation rules that are portable by nature, and available for download and for reuse by other investigators. RefSeq is found at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence
Cole, S. T., Brosch, R., Parkhill, J., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., Gordon, S. V., Eiglmeier, K., Gas, S., Barry, C. E., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31159 · Cited by 7,847
Cited by
COSMIC: the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer
Tate, J. G., Bamford, S., Jubb, H. C., Sondka, Z., Beare, D. M., Bindal, N., Boutselakis, H., Cole, C. G., Creatore, C., Dawson, E., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1015 · Cited by 4,867
A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life
Parks, D. H., Chuvochina, M., Waite, D. W., Rinke, C., Skarshewski, A., Chaumeil, P.-A., & Hugenholtz, P. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4229 · Cited by 3,603
UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025
The UniProt Consortium, Bateman, A., Martin, M.-J., Orchard, S., Magrane, M., Adesina, A., Ahmad, S., Bowler-Barnett, E. H., Bye-A-Jee, H., Carpentier, D., et al. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae1010 · Cited by 2,537
The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on
Blum, M., Chang, H.-Y., Chuguransky, S., Grego, T., Kandasaamy, S., Mitchell, A., Nuka, G., Paysan-Lafosse, T., Qureshi, M., Raj, S., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa977 · Cited by 2,231
Self-citationChklovski, A., Parks, D. H., Woodcroft, B. J., & Tyson, G. W. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01940-w · Cited by 1,705
Exploring bacterial diversity via a curated and searchable snapshot of archived DNA sequences
Blackwell, G. A., Hunt, M., Malone, K. M., Lima, L., Horesh, G., Alako, B. T. F., Thomson, N. R., & Iqbal, Z. (2021) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001421 · Cited by 111
Flannagan, R. S., Brozyna, J. R., Kumar, B., Adolf, L. A., Power, J. J., Heilbronner, S., & Heinrichs, D. E. (2022) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101823 · Cited by 23
Misztak, A. E., Waleron, M., Furmaniak, M., Waleron, M. M., Bazhenova, O., Daroch, M., & Waleron, K. F. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10123411 · Cited by 19
Zile, K., Dessimoz, C., Wurm, Y., & Masel, J. (2020) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa127 · Cited by 18
Koskinen, S., Kurkela, J., Linhartová, M., & Tyystjärvi, T. (2023) · FEBS Open Bio · doi:10.1002/2211-5463.13576 · Cited by 16
The potential of non-starter lactic acid bacteria from Cheddar cheese to colonise the gut
Leeuwendaal, N., Stanton, C., O'Toole, P. W., & Beresford, T. P. (2021) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2021.104425 · Cited by 14
da Silva, T. F., Glória, R. D. A., de Sousa, T. J., Americo, M. F., Freitas, A. D. S., Viana, M. V. C., de Jesus, L. C. L., da Silva Prado, L. C., Daniel, N., Ménard, O., et al. (2023) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-023-03112-4 · Cited by 11
Sleutel, M., Zegeye, E. D., Llarena, A.-K., Pradhan, B., Fislage, M., O’Sullivan, K., Van Gerven, N., Aspholm, M., & Remaut, H. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51804-w · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Haft, D. H., DiCuccio, M., Badretdin, A., Brover, V., Chetvernin, V., O’Neill, K., Li, W., Chitsaz, F., Derbyshire, M. K., Gonzales, N. R., Gwadz, M., Lu, F., Marchler, G. H., Song, J. S., Thanki, N., Yamashita, R. A., Zheng, C., Thibaud-Nissen, F., Geer, L. Y., Marchler-Bauer, A., & Pruitt, K. D.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-11-03
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D851-D860
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2766648240
- Cited by
- 987
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.