The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SymMap: an integrative database of traditional Chinese medicine enhanced by symptom mapping
Open accessAbstract
Recently, the pharmaceutical industry has heavily emphasized phenotypic drug discovery (PDD), which relies primarily on knowledge about phenotype changes associated with diseases. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) provides a massive amount of information on natural products and the clinical symptoms they are used to treat, which are the observable disease phenotypes that are crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Curating knowledge of TCM symptoms and their relationships to herbs and diseases will provide both candidate leads and screening directions for evidence-based PDD programs. Therefore, we present SymMap, an integrative database of traditional Chinese medicine enhanced by symptom mapping. We manually curated 1717 TCM symptoms and related them to 499 herbs and 961 symptoms used in modern medicine based on a committee of 17 leading experts practicing TCM. Next, we collected 5235 diseases associated with these symptoms, 19 595 herbal constituents (ingredients) and 4302 target genes, and built a large heterogeneous network containing all of these components. Thus, SymMap integrates TCM with modern medicine in common aspects at both the phenotypic and molecular levels. Furthermore, we inferred all pairwise relationships among SymMap components using statistical tests to give pharmaceutical scientists the ability to rank and filter promising results to guide drug discovery. The SymMap database can be accessed at http://www.symmap.org/ and https://www.bioinfo.org/symmap.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
TCMSP: a database of systems pharmacology for drug discovery from herbal medicines
Ru, J., Li, P., Wang, J., Zhou, W., Li, B., Huang, C., Li, P., Guo, Z., Tao, W., Yang, Y., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/1758-2946-6-13 · Cited by 5,038
DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration
Wishart, D. S. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj067 · Cited by 3,892
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders
Hamosh, A. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki033 · Cited by 3,420
Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170 · Cited by 3,341
On the Interpretation of χ 2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P
Fisher, R. A. (1922) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society · doi:10.2307/2340521 · Cited by 2,953
Natural products: A continuing source of novel drug leads
Cragg, G. M., & Newman, D. J. (2013) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.02.008 · Cited by 2,906
The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era
Harvey, A. L., Edrada-Ebel, R., & Quinn, R. J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4510 · Cited by 2,572
How were new medicines discovered?
Swinney, D. C., & Anthony, J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3480 · Cited by 1,812
The SIDER database of drugs and side effects
Kuhn, M., Letunic, I., Jensen, L. J., & Bork, P. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1075 · Cited by 1,451
Cited by
De Novo Design of New Chemical Entities for SARS-CoV-2 Using Artificial Intelligence
Bung, N., Krishnan, S. R., Bulusu, G., & Roy, A. (2021) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc-2020-0262 · Cited by 118
Zhou, H., Cao, H., Matyunina, L., Shelby, M., Cassels, L., McDonald, J. F., & Skolnick, J. (2020) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b01248 · Cited by 39
Liao, B., Zhang, C., Shen, J., Chen, D., Wang, J., Chen, X., Zhou, Y., Wei, Y., Shi, Y., Gou, L., et al. (2025) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-025-13411-7 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, Y., Zhang, F., Yang, K., Fang, S., Bu, D., Li, H., Sun, L., Hu, H., Gao, K., Wang, W., Zhou, X., Zhao, Y., & Chen, J.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-10-31
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D1110-D1117
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2899291554
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 43.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SymMap: an integrative database of traditional Chinese medicine enhanced by symptom mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gky1021
- The paper
- Wu, Y., Zhang, F., Yang, K., Fang, S., Bu, D., Li, H., Sun, L., Hu, H., Gao, K., Wang, W., Zhou, X., Zhao, Y., & Chen, J. (2019). SymMap: an integrative database of traditional Chinese medicine enhanced by symptom mapping. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.