The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building a livestock genetic and genomic information knowledgebase through integrative developments of Animal QTLdb and CorrDB
Open accessAbstract
Successful development of biological databases requires accommodation of the burgeoning amounts of data from high-throughput genomics pipelines. As the volume of curated data in Animal QTLdb (https://www.animalgenome.org/QTLdb) increases exponentially, the resulting challenges must be met with rapid infrastructure development to effectively accommodate abundant data curation and make metadata analysis more powerful. The development of Animal QTLdb and CorrDB for the past 15 years has provided valuable tools for researchers to utilize a wealth of phenotype/genotype data to study the genetic architecture of livestock traits. We have focused our efforts on data curation, improved data quality maintenance, new tool developments, and database co-developments, in order to provide convenient platforms for users to query and analyze data. The database currently has 158 499 QTL/associations, 10 482 correlations and 1977 heritability data as a result of an average 32% data increase per year. In addition, we have made >14 functional improvements or new tool implementations since our last report. Our ultimate goals of database development are to provide infrastructure for data collection, curation, and annotation, and more importantly, to support innovated data structure for new types of data mining, data reanalysis, and networked genetic analysis that lead to the generation of new knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn923 · Cited by 14,108
International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03154 · Cited by 2,750
Expansion of the Gene Ontology knowledgebase and resources
The Gene Ontology Consortium (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1108 · Cited by 1,850
Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution
Groenen, M. A. M., Archibald, A. L., Uenishi, H., Tuggle, C. K., Takeuchi, Y., Rothschild, M. F., Rogel-Gaillard, C., Park, C., Milan, D., Megens, H.-J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11622 · Cited by 1,385
Self-citationThe Genome Sequence of Taurine Cattle: A Window to Ruminant Biology and Evolution
The Bovine Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium, Elsik, C. G., Tellam, R. L., Worley, K. C., Gibbs, R. A., Muzny, D. M., Weinstock, G. M., Adelson, D. L., Eichler, E. E., Elnitski, L., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1169588 · Cited by 1,287
Self-citationA whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow, Bos taurus
Zimin, A. V., Delcher, A. L., Florea, L., Kelley, D. R., Schatz, M. C., Puiu, D., Hanrahan, F., Pertea, G., Van Tassell, C. P., Sonstegard, T. S., et al. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-4-r42 · Cited by 1,141
Berthelot, C., Brunet, F., Chalopin, D., Juanchich, A., Bernard, M., Noël, B., Bento, P., Da Silva, C., Labadie, K., Alberti, A., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4657 · Cited by 959
Cited by
Saravanan, K. A., Panigrahi, M., Kumar, H., Parida, S., Bhushan, B., Gaur, G. K., Dutt, T., Mishra, B. P., & Singh, R. K. (2021) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.02.009 · Cited by 98
Zhou, Y., Yang, L., Han, X., Han, J., Hu, Y., Li, F., Xia, H., Peng, L., Boschiero, C., Rosen, B. D., et al. (2022) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.276550.122 · Cited by 89
Igoshin, A., Yudin, N., Aitnazarov, R., Yurchenko, A. A., & Larkin, D. M. (2021) · Life · doi:10.3390/life11090959 · Cited by 19
Alvarenga, A. B., Oliveira, H. R., Turner, S. P., Garcia, A., Retallick, K. J., Miller, S. P., & Brito, L. F. (2023) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-023-00777-3 · Cited by 18
Crum, T. E., Schnabel, R. D., Decker, J. E., & Taylor, J. F. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.758394 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, Z.-L., Park, C. A., & Reecy, J. M.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-11-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D701-D710
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2899867539
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 27.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building a livestock genetic and genomic information knowledgebase through integrative developments of Animal QTLdb and CorrDB. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gky1084
- The paper
- Hu, Z.-L., Park, C. A., & Reecy, J. M. (2019). Building a livestock genetic and genomic information knowledgebase through integrative developments of Animal QTLdb and CorrDB. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
