The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GlioVis data portal for visualization and analysis of brain tumor expression datasets
Open accessAbstract
We are currently living in the “genomic era.” In the last decade, high-throughput genomic analyses have generated massive quantities of data that can be used to explore gene function in specific biological settings. In the field of cancer research, studies performed in a variety of laboratories and by a number of large-scale projects, like The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, http://cancergenome.nih.gov/, accessed October 31, 2016) and the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC),1 have given researchers an unparalleled amount of information on many different tumors through several platforms such as: mRNA expression arrays, comparative genomic hybridization arrays, DNA methylation arrays, exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, reverse protein phase arrays, and clinical parameters.2 Consolidating these data into an easily accessible and intuitive format is crucial for our ability to extrapolate any meaningful information.3 Although a few web portals, such as the cBioportal,4 UCSC,5 ICGC,1 Oasis,6 and others, have been developed to integrate and analyze multi-omics data from the various recent large-scale projects, these portals are missing most of the datasets and the thorough knowledge generated over the years by independent laboratories for specific tumor types. Here we introduce GlioVis (http://gliovis.bioinfo.cnio.es, accessed October 31, 2016), a powerful web-based tool to help researchers and clinicians to rapidly access data relevant to brain tumor research. The portal has been built with 2 extremely crucial issues in mind: easy use and reproducibility. GlioVis has a very intuitive interface, and no bioinformatics skills are required. For all the plots that are generated, the user can run different statistical tests, and the raw data to reproduce the plots can be downloaded for future analysis or publications. Currently GlioVis contains over 6500 tumor samples of approximately 50 expression datasets of a large collection of brain tumor entities (mostly gliomas), both adult and pediatric. Though at the moment only primary brain tumors are accessible through our portal, in the future we are also planning to include data for secondary/metastatic brain tumors, cell lines, and xenografts. A full list of the available datasets is presented on the GlioVis homepage. Raw expression data have been downloaded from various sources: Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, accessed October 31, 2016), ArrayExpress (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/, accessed October 31, 2016), and Firebrowse (http://firebrowse.org, accessed October 31, 2016). These data have then been processed using the R programming language7 and combined with manually curated phenotypic information to be visualized in a homogeneous and harmonized way (Fig. 1A). Details of the data processing can be found on the GlioVis help pages. The GlioVis data portal. (A) Schematic representation of data collection, processing, and incorporation into the portal. (B) Examples of available data visualization. (C) A series of tools allow users to analyze their own datasets. Through the GlioVis portal, users can explore the expression of a particular gene of interest taking advantage of all the information available for a specific dataset: histology, grade, subtype, copy number, etc (Fig. 1B). Data summaries allow users to obtain an overview of a given dataset or a specific gene in individual datasets. For glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) subtyping we have used the most recent 3-subtypes classification scheme.8 Briefly, after filtering out genes that are significantly highly expressed in tumor-associated microenvironment, unsupervised clustering grouped isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type GBM into 3 transcriptional subtypes. These subtypes, which are now based on gene expression in GBM cells only, recapitulated the proneural, classical, and mesenchymal subtypes but not the neural class. In addition to gene expression exploratory studies, it’s possible to perform various other analyses: survival, correlation, mutation, etc (some examples are shown in Fig. 1B). For all the available analysis tools, users can restrict their studies to specific groups of interest, such as a particular tumor histology or subtype. For example, when performing survival analysis in GBM it’s possible to exclude the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)+IDH wild-type samples and/or the recurrent tumors. CIMP status has been determined by supported vector machine (SVM), using GBM expression data from TCGA as the training dataset. GlioVis also provides a series of tools that allow users to analyze their own datasets. SubtypeME, currently only available for gliomas, uses 3 different algorithms—SVM, K-Nearest Neighbor, and single sample gene set enrichment analysis—to classify the tumor samples by subtypes. These algorithms have been used for the classification of all the GBM samples available through the portal. EstimateME calculates tumor purity by estimating stromal and im
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cerami, E., Gao, J., Dogrusoz, U., Gross, B. E., Sumer, S. O., Aksoy, B. A., Jacobsen, A., Byrne, C. J., Heuer, M. L., Larsson, E., et al. (2012) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0095 · Cited by 17,455
Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data
Yoshihara, K., Shahmoradgoli, M., Martínez, E., Vegesna, R., Kim, H., Torres-Garcia, W., Treviño, V., Shen, H., Laird, P. W., Levine, D. A., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3612 · Cited by 9,778
Self-citationInternational network of cancer genome projects
The International Cancer Genome Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08987 · Cited by 2,299
Wang, Q., Hu, B., Hu, X., Kim, H., Squatrito, M., Scarpace, L., deCarvalho, A. C., Lyu, S., Li, P., Li, Y., et al. (2017) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.06.003 · Cited by 1,995
Self-citationThe UCSC Cancer Genomics Browser: update 2013
Goldman, M., Craft, B., Swatloski, T., Ellrott, K., Cline, M., Diekhans, M., Ma, S., Wilks, C., Stuart, J., Haussler, D., et al. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1008 · Cited by 163
Visualizing multidimensional cancer genomics data
Schroeder, M. P., González-Pérez, A., & López-Bigas, N. (2013) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/gm413 · Cited by 104
Data mining The Cancer Genome Atlas in the era of precision cancer medicine
Cheng, P. F., Dummer, R., & Levesque, M. P. (2015) · Swiss Medical Weekly · doi:10.4414/smw.2015.14183 · Cited by 62
OASIS: web-based platform for exploring cancer multi-omics data
Fernandez-Banet, J., Esposito, A., Coffin, S., Horvath, I. B., Estrella, H., Schefzick, S., Deng, S., Wang, K., AChing, K., Ding, Y., et al. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3692 · Cited by 46
Cited by
Müller, S., Kohanbash, G., Liu, S. J., Alvarado, B., Carrera, D., Bhaduri, A., Watchmaker, P. B., Yagnik, G., Di Lullo, E., Malatesta, M., et al. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1362-4 · Cited by 654
Explainable Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cyber Security: State-of-the-Art in Research
Zhang, Z., Hamadi, H. A., Damiani, E., Yeun, C. Y., & Taher, F. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204051 · Cited by 450
The Phenotypes of Proliferating Glioblastoma Cells Reside on a Single Axis of Variation
Wang, L., Babikir, H., Müller, S., Yagnik, G., Shamardani, K., Catalan, F., Kohanbash, G., Alvarado, B., Di Lullo, E., Kriegstein, A., et al. (2019) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0329 · Cited by 363
Symbiotic Macrophage-Glioma Cell Interactions Reveal Synthetic Lethality in PTEN-Null Glioma
Chen, P., Zhao, D., Li, J., Liang, X., Li, J., Chang, A., Henry, V. K., Lan, Z., Spring, D. J., Rao, G., et al. (2019) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2019.05.003 · Cited by 339
N-methyladenine DNA Modification in Glioblastoma
Xie, Q., Wu, T. P., Gimple, R. C., Li, Z., Prager, B. C., Wu, Q., Yu, Y., Wang, P., Wang, Y., Gorkin, D. U., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.006 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowman, R. L., Wang, Q., Carro, A., Verhaak, R. G. W., & Squatrito, M.
- Venue
- Neuro-Oncology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-11-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-141
- ISSN
- 1522-8517 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-5866
- OpenAlex
- W2554863679
- Cited by
- 851
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 23.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GlioVis data portal for visualization and analysis of brain tumor expression datasets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/neuonc/now247
- The paper
- Bowman, R. L., Wang, Q., Carro, A., Verhaak, R. G. W., & Squatrito, M. (2017). GlioVis data portal for visualization and analysis of brain tumor expression datasets. Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.