Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Phenotypes of Proliferating Glioblastoma Cells Reside on a Single Axis of Variation

Open access
Wang, Lin, Babikir, Husam, Müller, Sören, Yagnik, Garima, Shamardani, Karin, Catalan, Francisca, Kohanbash, Gary, Alvarado, Beatriz, Di Lullo, Elizabeth, Kriegstein, Arnold, Shah, Sumedh, Wadhwa, Harsh, Chang, Susan M., Phillips, Joanna J., Aghi, Manish K., Diaz, Aaron A.·2019·Cancer Discovery

Abstract

Although tumor-propagating cells can be derived from glioblastomas (GBM) of the proneural and mesenchymal subtypes, a glioma stem-like cell (GSC) of the classic subtype has not been identified. It is unclear whether mesenchymal GSCs (mGSC) and/or proneural GSCs (pGSC) alone are sufficient to generate the heterogeneity observed in GBM. We performed single-cell/single-nucleus RNA sequencing of 28 gliomas, and single-cell ATAC sequencing for 8 cases. We found that GBM GSCs reside on a single axis of variation, ranging from proneural to mesenchymal. In silico lineage tracing using both transcriptomics and genetics supports mGSCs as the progenitors of pGSCs. Dual inhibition of pGSC-enriched and mGSC-enriched growth and survival pathways provides a more complete treatment than combinations targeting one GSC phenotype alone. This study sheds light on a long-standing debate regarding lineage relationships among GSCs and presents a paradigm by which personalized combination therapies can be derived from single-cell RNA signatures, to overcome intratumor heterogeneity. Significance: Tumor-propagating cells can be derived from mesenchymal and proneural glioblastomas. However, a stem cell of the classic subtype has yet to be demonstrated. We show that classic-subtype gliomas are comprised of proneural and mesenchymal cells. This study sheds light on a long-standing debate regarding lineage relationships between glioma cell types. See related commentary by Fine, p. 1650. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1631

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0329

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., Babikir, H., Müller, S., Yagnik, G., Shamardani, K., Catalan, F., Kohanbash, G., Alvarado, B., Di Lullo, E., Kriegstein, A., Shah, S., Wadhwa, H., Chang, S. M., Phillips, J. J., Aghi, M. K., & Diaz, A. A.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2019-12-01
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
1708-1719
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2975379509
Cited by
363
References
31
FWCI
19.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Phenotypes of Proliferating Glioblastoma Cells Reside on a Single Axis of Variation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0329
The paper
Wang, L., Babikir, H., Müller, S., Yagnik, G., Shamardani, K., Catalan, F., Kohanbash, G., Alvarado, B., Di Lullo, E., Kriegstein, A., Shah, S., Wadhwa, H., Chang, S. M., Phillips, J. J., Aghi, M. K., & Diaz, A. A. (2019). The Phenotypes of Proliferating Glioblastoma Cells Reside on a Single Axis of Variation. Cancer Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0329

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.