Cited by 408Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsPeatlands and Wetlands EcologySoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global blue carbon accumulation in tidal wetlands increases with climate change

Open access

Abstract

Abstract Coastal tidal wetlands produce and accumulate significant amounts of organic carbon (C) that help to mitigate climate change. However, previous data limitations have prevented a robust evaluation of the global rates and mechanisms driving C accumulation. Here, we go beyond recent soil C stock estimates to reveal global tidal wetland C accumulation and predict changes under relative sea level rise, temperature and precipitation. We use data from literature study sites and our new observations spanning wide latitudinal gradients and 20 countries. Globally, tidal wetlands accumulate 53.65 (95%CI: 48.52–59.01) Tg C yr−1, which is ∼30% of the organic C buried on the ocean floor. Modeling based on current climatic drivers and under projected emissions scenarios revealed a net increase in the global C accumulation by 2100. This rapid increase is driven by sea level rise in tidal marshes, and higher temperature and precipitation in mangroves. Countries with large areas of coastal wetlands, like Indonesia and Mexico, are more susceptible to tidal wetland C losses under climate change, while regions such as Australia, Brazil, the USA and China will experience a significant C accumulation increase under all projected scenarios.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nsr/nwaa296

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 74 references

3 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Breithaupt, 2012, Organic carbon burial rates in mangrove sediments: strengthening the global budget, Glob Biogeochem Cycles, 26, GB3011, 10.1029/2012GB004375 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Center for Hazards and Risk Research Columbia University, Center for International Earth Science Information Network Columbia University and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development - The World Bank, 2005, Global Cyclone Hazard Frequency and Distribution

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 408

Metadata

Authors
Wang, F., Sanders, C. J., Santos, I. R., Tang, J., Schuerch, M., Kirwan, M. L., Kopp, R. E., Zhu, K., Li, X., Yuan, J., Liu, W., & Li, Z.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research (CN)
  • Southern Cross University (AU)
  • University of Lincoln (GB)
  • William & Mary (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Xiaoliang Research Station for Tropical Coastal Ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, and the CAS Engineering Laboratory for Ecological Restoration of Island and Coastal Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Faming
  • Sanders, Christian J
Venue
National Science Review
Published
2020-12-15
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
nwaa296-nwaa296
ISSN
  • 2053-714X (ISSN-L)
  • 2095-5138
OpenAlex
W3112344741
Cited by
408
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 12
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Science Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • W&M Publish (College of William & Mary) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31670621, 31870463)
  • Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (GML2019ZD0408)
  • Guangdong Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars
  • CAS Youth Innovation Promotion Association
  • National Forestry and Grassland Administration Youth Talent Support Program (2020BJ003)
  • R & D program of Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology (2018B030324003)
  • I.R.S.
  • Australian Research Council (DE160100443, DP150103286, DE140101733, LE140100083)
  • NOAA National Estuarine Research Reserve Science Collaborative (NA09NOS4190153, NA14NOS4190145)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
blue carbon, tidal wetlands, organic carbon accumulation, coastal carbon sequestration, sea level rise, mangroves, tidal marshes, climate change impacts, latitudinal gradient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review