Cited by 10Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Reliable prediction of protein–protein binding affinity changes upon mutations with Pythia-PPI

Open access
Tao, Fangting, Sun, Jinyuan, Gao, Pengyue, Gao, George Fu, Wu, Bian·2025·National Science Review

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are essential for numerous biological functions and predicting binding affinity changes caused by mutations is crucial for understanding the impact of genetic variation and advancing protein engineering. Although machine-learning-based methods show promise in improving prediction accuracy, limited experimental data remain a significant bottleneck. In this study, we employed multitask learning and self-distillation to overcome the data limitation and improve the accuracy of protein–protein binding affinity prediction. By incorporating a mutation stability prediction task, our model achieved state-of-the-art accuracy on the SKEMPI dataset and was subsequently used to predict binding affinity changes for millions of mutations, generating an expanded dataset for self-distillation. Compared with prevalent methods, Pythia-PPI increased the Pearson's correlation between predictions and experimental data from 0.6447 to 0.7850 on the SKEMPI dataset and from 0.3654 to 0.6050 on the viral-receptor dataset. Experimental validation further confirmed its ability to identify high-affinity mutations on the CB6 antibody in complex with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 prototype receptor binding domain, with the best single-point mutant among the top 10 predictions showing a 2-fold increase in binding affinity. These findings demonstrate that Pythia-PPI is a valuable tool for analysing the fitness landscape of PPIs. A web server for Pythia-PPI is available at https://pythiappi.wulab.xyz for easy access.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nsr/nwaf231

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tao, F., Sun, J., Gao, P., Gao, G. F., & Wu, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Gao, George Fu
  • Wu, Bian
Venue
National Science Review
Published
2025-05-05
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
nwaf231-nwaf231
ISSN
  • 2053-714X (ISSN-L)
  • 2095-5138
OpenAlex
W4411175534
Cited by
10
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Science Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFC3405500)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (buctrc202539)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170033, 32225002, 32422001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, binding affinity prediction, multi-task learning, self-distillation, viral receptor binding, SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain, protein engineering, fitness landscape

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review