Reliable prediction of protein–protein binding affinity changes upon mutations with Pythia-PPI
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are essential for numerous biological functions and predicting binding affinity changes caused by mutations is crucial for understanding the impact of genetic variation and advancing protein engineering. Although machine-learning-based methods show promise in improving prediction accuracy, limited experimental data remain a significant bottleneck. In this study, we employed multitask learning and self-distillation to overcome the data limitation and improve the accuracy of protein–protein binding affinity prediction. By incorporating a mutation stability prediction task, our model achieved state-of-the-art accuracy on the SKEMPI dataset and was subsequently used to predict binding affinity changes for millions of mutations, generating an expanded dataset for self-distillation. Compared with prevalent methods, Pythia-PPI increased the Pearson's correlation between predictions and experimental data from 0.6447 to 0.7850 on the SKEMPI dataset and from 0.3654 to 0.6050 on the viral-receptor dataset. Experimental validation further confirmed its ability to identify high-affinity mutations on the CB6 antibody in complex with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 prototype receptor binding domain, with the best single-point mutant among the top 10 predictions showing a 2-fold increase in binding affinity. These findings demonstrate that Pythia-PPI is a valuable tool for analysing the fitness landscape of PPIs. A web server for Pythia-PPI is available at https://pythiappi.wulab.xyz for easy access.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning
(2007) · doi:10.1145/1273496 · Cited by 11,869 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning
Zhuang, F., Qi, Z., Duan, K., Xi, D., Zhu, Y., Zhu, H., Xiong, H., & He, Q. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.3004555 · Cited by 6,678 · see citing works
ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence
Landrum, M. J., Lee, J. M., Benson, M., Brown, G. R., Chao, C., Chitipiralla, S., Gu, B., Hart, J., Hoffman, D., Jang, W., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1153 · Cited by 4,196 · see citing works
Dominant forces in protein folding
Dill, K. A. (1990) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00483a001 · Cited by 3,824 · see citing works
A Survey on Multi-Task Learning
Zhang, Y., & Yang, Q. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3070203 · Cited by 3,083 · see citing works
Principles of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684 · see citing works
A Human Protein-Protein Interaction Network: A Resource for Annotating the Proteome
Stelzl, U., Worm, U., Lalowski, M. M., Haenig, C., Brembeck, F. H., Goehler, H., Strödicke, M., Zenkner, M., Schoenherr, A., Koeppen, S., et al. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.029 · Cited by 2,389 · see citing works
Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN
Dauparas, J., Anishchenko, I., Bennett, N., Bai, H., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Courbet, A., de Haas, R. J., Bethel, N., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.06.03.494563 · Cited by 2,107 · see citing works
Robust deep learning–based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN
Dauparas, J., Anishchenko, I., Bennett, N., Bai, H., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Courbet, A., de Haas, R. J., Bethel, N., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add2187 · Cited by 2,070 · see citing works
Reaching for high-hanging fruit in drug discovery at protein–protein interfaces
Wells, J. A., & McClendon, C. L. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06526 · Cited by 1,963 · see citing works
Starr, T. N., Greaney, A. J., Hilton, S. K., Ellis, D., Crawford, K. H. D., Dingens, A. S., Navarro, M. J., Bowen, J. E., Tortorici, M. A., Walls, A. C., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.012 · Cited by 1,956 · see citing works
The Rosetta All-Atom Energy Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Design
Alford, R. F., Leaver-Fay, A., Jeliazkov, J. R., O’Meara, M. J., DiMaio, F. P., Park, H., Shapovalov, M. V., Renfrew, P. D., Mulligan, V. K., Kappel, K., et al. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125 · Cited by 1,532 · see citing works
A human neutralizing antibody targets the receptor-binding site of SARS-CoV-2
Shi, R., Shan, C., Duan, X., Chen, Z., Liu, P., Song, J., Song, T., Bi, X., Han, C., Wu, L., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2381-y · Cited by 1,286 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnsson, B., Löfås, S., & Lindquist, G. (1991) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(91)90424-r · Cited by 1,272 · see citing works
Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model
Hayes, T., Rao, R., Akin, H., Sofroniew, N. J., Oktay, D., Lin, Z., Verkuil, R., Tran, V. Q., Deaton, J., Wiggert, M., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ads0018 · Cited by 937 · see citing works
A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes
Kortemme, T., & Baker, D. A. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.202485799 · Cited by 801 · see citing works
AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data
Shumailov, I., Shumaylov, Z., Zhao, Y., Papernot, N., Anderson, R., & Gal, Y. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07566-y · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function
Meier, J., Rao, R., Verkuil, R., Liu, J., Sercu, T., & Rives, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.09.450648 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Data collection and quality challenges in deep learning: a data-centric AI perspective
Whang, S. E., Roh, Y., Song, H., & Lee, J.-G. (2023) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-022-00775-9 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
FoldX 5.0: working with RNA, small molecules and a new graphical interface
Delgado, J., Radusky, L., Cianferoni, D., & Serrano, L. G. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz184 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
Kastritis, P. L., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2012) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0835 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Jankauskaitė, J., Jiménez-García, B., Dapkūnas, J., Fernández-Recio, J., & Moal, I. H. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty635 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Transfer learning to leverage larger datasets for improved prediction of protein stability changes
Dieckhaus, H., Brocidiacono, M., Randolph, N. Z., & Kuhlman, B. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2314853121 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Shan, S., Luo, S., Yang, Z., Hong, J., Su, Y., Ding, F., Fu, L., Li, C., Chen, P., Ma, J., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2122954119 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Targeting protein–protein interactions for cancer therapy
Fry, D. C., & Vassilev, L. T. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00109-005-0705-x · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Characterization of Protein-Protein Interactions by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry
Velázquez‐Campoy, A., Leavitt, S. A., & Freire, E. (2015) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2425-7_11 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
FireProtDB: database of manually curated protein stability data
Štourač, J., Dubrava, J., Musil, M., Horackova, J., Damborský, J., Mazurenko, S., & Bednář, D. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa981 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Unscrambling the puzzle of biological machines: The importance of the details
Alberts, B., & Miake-Lye, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90179-g · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Diaz, D. J., Gong, C., Ouyang-Zhang, J., Loy, J. M., Wells, J., Yang, D. K., Ellington, A. D., Dimakis, A. G., & Klivans, A. R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49780-2 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Opportunities and Challenges in Data-Centric AI
Kumar, S., Datta, S., Singh, V., Singh, S. K., & Sharma, R. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3369417 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Protein interactions in human pathogens revealed through deep learning
Humphreys, I. R., Zhang, J., Baek, M., Wang, Y., Krishnakumar, A., Pei, J., Anishchenko, I. V., Tower, C. A., Jackson, B. A., Warrier, T., et al. (2024) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-024-01791-x · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Bacon, K. B., Blain, A., Bowen, J., Burroughs, M. R., McArthur, N., Menegatti, S., & Rao, B. M. (2021) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.0c00472 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Luo, S., Su, Y., Wu, Z., Su, C., Peng, J., & Ma, J. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.02.28.530137 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Computing the Human InteractomePreprint
Zhang, J., Humphreys, I. R., Pei, J., Kim, J., Choi, C., Yuan, R., Durham, J., Liu, S., Choi, H., Baek, M., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.01.615885 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Sun, J., Zhu, T., Cui, Y., & Wu, B. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.08.09.552725 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding Self-Distillation in the Presence of Label NoisePreprint
Das, R., & Sanghavi, S. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.13304 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rice2035: A decadal vision for rice research and breeding
Yu, H., Xu, Y., Gu, Z., Wang, K., Zhang, T., Qian, Q., & Li, J. (2026) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2026.02.009 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Hu, J., Wu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, Q., Chai, Z., Li, D., Zhao, D., Wu, B., Gao, X., Liu, X., et al. (2026) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2026.03.006 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationLü, Y., Liu, C., Zou, Y., Zhou, L., Zhou, Y., Wei, H., Li, Q., Xie, F., Gong, S., & Wang, J. (2026) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.151349 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Guo, Y., Li, D., You, S., Su, R., & Qi, W. (2026) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.151408 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Wang, J., & Gao, G. F. (2025) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf225 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationPythiaStudio: a one-stop protein engineering platform powered by Pythia model suite
Sun, J., Shi, K., Li, H., 崔颖鹿, Wang, L., & Wu, B. (2026) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkag408
Self-citationPark, S. J., Yim, S., Kim, D., Yoo, K., Hwang, D., Lee, K., Jang, J., & Kim, K. (2026) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btag489
Noske, J., Lepoivre, T., Janzen, M., & Höcker, B. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.09.22.753561
Mao, S., Meng, S., & Xiang, Y. (2026) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.117693
Xu, H., Mi, R., Bai, G., Kang, Y., Sun, C., Wang, Y., Chen, C., & Ma, B. (2026) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2026.2743404
- Authors
- Tao, F., Sun, J., Gao, P., Gao, G. F., & Wu, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Gao, George Fu
- Wu, Bian
- Venue
- National Science Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-05-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- nwaf231-nwaf231
- ISSN
- 2053-714X (ISSN-L)
- 2095-5138
- PMC
- PMC12199698
- OpenAlex
- W4411175534
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- National Science Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFC3405500)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (buctrc202539)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170033, 32225002, 32422001)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, binding affinity prediction, multi-task learning, self-distillation, viral receptor binding, SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain, protein engineering, fitness landscape
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review