Cited by 12Smoking Behavior and CessationBipolar Disorder and TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Mood management and nicotine patch for smoking cessation in adults with bipolar disorder

Open access
Heffner, J. L., Anthenelli, R. M., DelBello, M. P., Stahl, L., Strakowski, S. M.·2013·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

Cigarette smoking is three times more prevalent in bipolar disorder than in the general population, and quit rates are low (Lasser et al., 2000). Only two small (n = 5) pharmacotherapy studies (Weinberger et al., 2008; Wu et al., 2012) have examined interventions for smokers with bipolar disorder. Targeted behavioral interventions designed to address barriers to quitting in bipolar disorder may improve quit rates. Cognitive-behavioral mood management interventions have demonstrated some success in treating depressed smokers (Haas, Muñoz, Humfleet, Reus, & Hall, 2004) and may be useful for smokers with bipolar disorder, but no studies have tested this proposition. Consequently, we examined the feasibility of a mood management intervention for smokers with bipolar disorder in a proof-of-concept study. Participants were adult smokers (≥18 years old) who met DSM-IV criteria for bipolar I disorder; smoked ≥10 cigarettes/day for the past 90 days, with expired air carbon monoxide (CO) level ≥ 10 ppm; scored ≥6 on a 10-point scale of motivation to quit smoking; were nicotine dependent, minimally symptomatic (i.e., Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS; Montgomery & Asberg, 1979] ≤ 12; Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS; Young, Biggs, Ziegler, & Meyer, 1978] ≤ 12), and taking psychotropic medications that had been stable for at least 3 months. Individuals were excluded if they had current alcohol or other substance dependence; had an unstable medical condition; were pregnant, lactating, or planned to become pregnant during the study interval; had received treatment for smoking cessation within 30 days of screening; or tested positive for drugs other than cannabis. Individuals who tested positive for cannabis were enrolled only if they agreed to refrain from marijuana in the 24hr prior to study visits. This study was approved by the University of Cincinnati Institutional Review Board, and participants provided written informed consent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntt076

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a small open study of CBT-based mood management in people with bipolar disorder and comorbid nicotine dependence, at study endpoint 20% of subjects refrained from smoking for 4 weeks, and 77% of those completing the study achieved a reduction in self-reported cigarettes per day of 50% or higher.

    “At study endpoint, 20% of subjects managed to refrain from smocking for 4 weeks, and 77% of those completing the study achieved a reduction in self-reported cigarettes per day of 50% or higher.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Carroll K., O’Malley S. (1996). Compliance enhancement: A manual for the psychopharmacotherapy of alcohol dependence. New Haven, CT: [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heffner, J. L., Anthenelli, R. M., DelBello, M. P., Stahl, L., & Strakowski, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2013-06-12
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
1805-1806
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2155543059
Cited by
12
References
8
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000077)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA026517)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
bipolar disorder, smoking cessation, nicotine patch, mood management, cognitive-behavioral intervention, nicotine dependence, feasibility, cannabis use
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Behavior Therapy, Bipolar Disorder, Counseling, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Smoking, Stress, Psychological, Smoking Cessation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review